Re: Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

6 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e12
Journal	Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
Volume	27
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444
Publication status	Published - 2016
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

@article{a170185cf98d4f4083348317f18e7ff0,

title = "Re: Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure?",

author = "Schmidt, \{Amand F.\} and Frank Dudbridge and Groenwold, \{Rolf H. H.\}",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "e12",

journal = "Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)",

issn = "1044-3983",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re

T2 - Is the risk difference really a more heterogeneous measure?

AU - Schmidt, Amand F.

AU - Dudbridge, Frank

AU - Groenwold, Rolf H. H.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964077791

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26808601

U2 - 10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444

DO - 10.1097/eDe.0000000000000444

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 26808601

SN - 1044-3983

VL - 27

SP - e12

JO - Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)

JF - Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)

IS - 3

ER -