Re: Ethics committee decisions are best taken as weighted evaluations from the whole meeting - Reply

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	545-546
Journal	Journal of clinical epidemiology
Volume	59
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.005
Publication status	Published - 2006

Access to Document

@article{7dd09a6accbc4938be775bf71905fc58,

title = "Re: Ethics committee decisions are best taken as weighted evaluations from the whole meeting - Reply",

author = "R. Schellings and Kessels, \{A. G.\} and \{ter Riet\}, G. and J. Kleijnen and P. Leffers and Knotternus, \{J. A.\} and F. Sturmans",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.005",

language = "English",

volume = "59",

pages = "545--546",

journal = "Journal of clinical epidemiology",

issn = "0895-4356",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re: Ethics committee decisions are best taken as weighted evaluations from the whole meeting - Reply

AU - Schellings, R.

AU - Kessels, A. G.

AU - ter Riet, G.

AU - Kleijnen, J.

AU - Leffers, P.

AU - Knotternus, J. A.

AU - Sturmans, F.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.005

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 0895-4356

VL - 59

SP - 545

EP - 546

JO - Journal of clinical epidemiology

JF - Journal of clinical epidemiology

IS - 5

ER -