Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT

  • Noortje Catharina Hagemeijer
  • , Song Ho Chang
  • , Mohamed Elghazy Abdelaziz
  • , Jack Christopher Casey
  • , Gregory Richard Waryasz
  • , Daniel Guss
  • , Christopher William DiGiovanni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

70 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Early recognition of syndesmotic instability is critical for optimizing clinical outcome. Injuries causing a more subtle instability, however, can be difficult to diagnose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both distal tibiofibular articulations using weightbearing computed tomography (CT) in patients with known syndesmotic instability, thereafter comparing findings between the injured and uninjured sides. We also aimed to define the range of normal measurement variation among patients without syndesmotic injury. Methods: Patients with unilateral syndesmotic instability requiring operative fixation (n = 12) underwent preoperative bilateral ankle weightbearing CT. A separate cohort of patients without ankle injury who also underwent bilateral ankle weightbearing CT were included as comparative controls (n = 24). For each weightbearing CT, a series of 7 axial plane tibiofibular joint measurements, including 1 angular measurement, were utilized to evaluate parameters of the syndesmotic anatomy at a level 1 cm above the tibial plafond. Values were recorded by 2 independent observers to assess for interobserver reliability. Results: Among those with unilateral syndesmotic instability, values differed between the injured and uninjured sides in 4 of the 7 measurements performed including the syndesmotic area: direct anterior, middle, and posterior differences, and sagittal translation (P <.001, <.001, <.001, and <.001, respectively). In the control population without ankle injury, no differences were identified between any of the bilateral measurements (P value range,.172-.961). Conclusion: This study highlights the ability of weightbearing CT to effectively differentiate syndesmotic diastasis among patients with surgically confirmed syndesmotic instability from those without syndesmotic instability. It underscores the substantial utility and importance of using the contralateral, uninjured side as a valid internal control whenever the need for confirming potential syndesmotic instability arises. Prospective studies are necessary to fully understand the accuracy of weightbearing CT in diagnosing occult syndesmotic instability among patients for whom the diagnosis remains in question. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative diagnostic study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1430-1437
JournalFoot & ankle international / American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society
Volume40
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this