Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized, blinded trial comparing fondaparinux with unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention - Arixtra study in percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized evaluation (ASPIRE) pilot trial

  • Shamir R. Mehta
  • , Philippe Gabriel Steg
  • , Christopher B. Granger
  • , Jean-Pierre Bassand
  • , David P. Faxon
  • , Jeffrey I. Weitz
  • , Rizwan Afzal
  • , Bonnie Rush
  • , Ron J. G. Peters
  • , Madhu K. Natarajan
  • , James L. Velianou
  • , David M. Goodhart
  • , Marino Labinaz
  • , Jean-Francois Tanguay
  • , Keith A. A. Fox
  • , Salim Yusuf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background-Factor Xa plays a central role in the generation of thrombin, making it a novel target for treatment of arterial thrombosis. Fondaparinux is a synthetic factor Xa inhibitor that has been shown to be superior to standard therapies for the prevention of venous thrombosis. We performed a randomized trial to determine the safety and feasibility of fondaparinux in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) setting. Methods and Results-A total of 350 patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI were randomized in a blinded manner to receive unfractionated heparin (UFH), 2.5 mg fondaparinux IV, or 5.0 mg fondaparinux IV. Randomization was stratified for planned or no planned use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists. The primary safety outcome was total bleeding, which was a combination of major and minor bleeding events. The incidence of total bleeding was 7.7% in the UFH group and 6.4% in the combined fondaparinux groups (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 1.84; P=0.61). Bleeding was less common in the 2.5-mg fondaparinux group compared with the 5-mg fondaparinux group (3.4% versus 9.6%, P=0.06). The composite efficacy outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or need for a bailout GPIIb/IIIa antagonist was 6.0% in the UFH group and 6.0% in the fondaparinux group, with no significant difference in efficacy among the fondaparinux doses compared with UFH. Coagulation marker analysis at 6 and 12 hours after PCI demonstrated that fondaparinux was superior to UFH in inducing a sustained reduction in markers of thrombin generation, as measured by prothrombin fragment F1.2 (P=0.02). Conclusions-In this pilot study of patients undergoing contemporary PCI, factor Xa inhibition with the synthetic anticoagulant fondaparinux in doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg was comparable to UFH for clinical safety and efficacy outcomes. These data form the basis for further evaluation of fondaparinux in arterial thrombosis
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1390-1397
JournalCirculation
Volume111
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized, blinded trial comparing fondaparinux with unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention - Arixtra study in percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized evaluation (ASPIRE) pilot trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this