Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

  • David A. Leiman*
  • , Afrin N. Kamal
  • , Fouad Otaki
  • , Albert J. Bredenoord
  • , Evan S. Dellon
  • , Gary W. Falk
  • , Nielsen Q. Fernandez-Becker
  • , Nirmala Gonsalves
  • , Ikuo Hirano
  • , David A. Katzka
  • , Kathryn Peterson
  • , Rena Yadlapati
  • , Priya Kathpalia
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Duke University
  • Stanford University
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • University of North Carolina
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Northwestern University
  • Columbia University
  • University of Utah
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of California at San Francisco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:Despite best practice recommendations for managing eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), variation in care exists.METHODS:We used established methodology for quality indicator development to identify metrics to define quality for the treatment of EoE.RESULTS:Among 29 proposed quality indicator statements, 9 (31%) were adopted as highly valid across all categories. Two (22%) of these statements were identified as having existing or suspected quality gaps.DISCUSSION:We identified highly valid EoE quality indicators for adult gastroenterologists, which can be used for quality improvement with resulting benefits for patient outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1091-1095
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican journal of gastroenterology
Volume118
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
  • Practice quality
  • Quality improvement
  • Quality indicators

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this