Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality improvement of Dutch ICUs from 2009 to 2021: A registry based observational study

  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital
  • National Intensive Care Evaluation Foundation
  • Maastricht University Medical Center
  • St. Antonius Hospital
  • University of Utrecht
  • Martini Hospital
  • Amsterdam
  • Amphia Hospital
  • National Intensive Care Evaluation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Amsterdam Public Health
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • Maastricht UMC+
  • Department of Pulmonology, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Purmerend, the Netherlands
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Department of Radiology, Isala Ziekenhuis, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Martini Ziekenhuis
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • University of Amsterdam
  • National Intensive Care Evaluation
  • VU University and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute
  • Leiden University
  • locatie West Previously Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis
  • Maastricht University
  • Dijklander Ziekenhuis
  • Departments of Surgery and Medical Oncology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • Utrecht University
  • Dutch Expertise Centre for Neuro-ophthalmology and MS Centre, Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Amphia ziekenhuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the development in quality of ICU care over time using the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included data from all ICU admissions in the Netherlands from those ICUs that submitted complete data between 2009 and 2021 to the NICE registry. We determined median and interquartile range for eight quality indicators. To evaluate changes over time on the indicators, we performed multilevel regression analyses, once without and once with the COVID-19 years 2020 and 2021 included. Additionally we explored between-ICU heterogeneity by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS: 705,822 ICU admissions from 55 (65%) ICUs were included in the analyses. ICU length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), readmissions, in-hospital mortality, hypoglycemia, and pressure ulcers decreased significantly between 2009 and 2019 (OR <1). After including the COVID-19 pandemic years, the significant change in MV duration, ICU LOS, and pressure ulcers disappeared. We found an ICC ≤0.07 on the quality indicators for all years, except for pressure ulcers with an ICC of 0.27 for 2009 to 2021.

CONCLUSIONS: Quality of Dutch ICU care based on seven indicators significantly improved from 2009 to 2019 and between-ICU heterogeneity is medium to small, except for pressure ulcers. The COVID-19 pandemic disturbed the trend in quality improvement, but unaltered the between-ICU heterogeneity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number154461
Pages (from-to)154461
JournalJournal of critical care
Volume79
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Quality Improvement
  • Pandemics
  • Pressure Ulcer
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Length of Stay
  • Registries
  • Hospital Mortality
  • COVID-19/therapy
  • Cluster analysis
  • Quality indicator
  • Trends

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality improvement of Dutch ICUs from 2009 to 2021: A registry based observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this