Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pretreatment factors predict overall survival for patients with low-grade glioma: a recursive partitioning analysis

  • G. Bauman
  • , K. Lote
  • , D. Larson
  • , L. Stalpers
  • , C. Leighton
  • , B. Fisher
  • , W. Wara
  • , D. MacDonald
  • , L. Stitt
  • , J. G. Cairncross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Three databases were pooled and analyzed to determine which groupings of prognostic factors best predicted overall survival for patients with low-grade gliomas treated with surgery and immediate or delayed radiotherapy. Databases of patients with low-grade gliomas compiled at the London Regional Cancer Centre (LRCC), the Norwegian Radium Hospital (NRH), and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) were merged. Inclusion criteria for the pooled analysis included: age > or =18 years and histologically confirmed low-grade (World Health Organization Grade II) supratentorial fibrillary astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma or mixed oligoastrocytoma. Factors analyzed for prognostic significance included: age at diagnosis, gender, seizures at presentation, presence of enhancement on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at diagnosis, histology, extent of surgical resection, timing of radiotherapy, and treating institution. Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival for these factors was performed. Recursive partitioning was performed to generate prognostic groups using these factors. From the combined databases, 401 patients were eligible for analysis. Median survival for the entire group was 95 months/7.9 years. On univariate analysis age 18-40, presence of seizures at presentation, KPS > or =70, treating institution, and absence of contrast enhancement were associated with improved overall survival. On multivariate analysis, these factors remained independent predictors of improved overall survival. Recursive partitioning analysis yielded four prognostic groups with statistically different median survivals (MS): Group I (n = 41: KPS <70, age >40) MS 12 months; Group II (n = 34: KPS > or =70, age >40, enhancement present) MS 46 months; Group III (n = 138: KPS <70, age 18-40 or KPS > or =70 age >40, no enhancement) MS 87 months; Group IV (n = 188: KPS > or =70, age 18-40) MS 128 months. Clusters of pretreatment prognostic factors described subgroups of low-grade glioma patients with divergent overall survivals. Consideration of these prognostic subgroups may be important when considering timing of interventions for these patients and in the stratification of patients for clinical trials
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)923-929
JournalInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pretreatment factors predict overall survival for patients with low-grade glioma: a recursive partitioning analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this