Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Presentation, care, and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to World Bank country income classification: The ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI Registry of the European Society of Cardiology

  • on behalf of the NSTEMI investigator group
  • University of Leeds
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
  • University of Birmingham
  • European Society of Cardiology
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
  • Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer
  • Szpital Grochowski, Warszawa
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares
  • Complutense University
  • Klinik Ottakring
  • Sigmund Freud University Vienna
  • Medical School
  • Freeman Hospital
  • University of Pavia
  • IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Monza
  • Clinical Center of Serbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

158 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background The majority of NSTEMI burden resides outside high-income countries (HICs). We describe presentation, care, and outcomes of NSTEMI by country income classification. Methods and Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by World Bank results country income classification. Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions. The all-or-none scoring composite performance measure was used to define receipt of optimal care. Outcomes included in-hospital acute heart failure, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and death, and 30-day mortality. Patients admitted with NSTEMI in low to lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs), compared with patients in HICs, were younger, more commonly diabetic, and current smokers, but with a lower burden of other comorbidities, and 76.7% met very high risk criteria for an immediate invasive strategy. Invasive coronary angiography use increased with ascending income classification (LLMICs, 79.2%; upper middle income countries [UMICs], 83.7%; HICs, 91.0%), but overall care quality did not (>80% of eligible interventions achieved: LLMICS, 64.8%; UMICs 69.6%; HICs 55.1%). Rates of acute heart failure (LLMICS, 21.3%; UMICs, 12.1%; HICs, 6.8%; P < 0.001), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (LLMICS: 2.5%; UMICs: 1.5%; HICs: 0.9%; P = 0.04), in-hospital mortality (LLMICS, 3.6%; UMICs: 2.8%; HICs: 1.0%; P < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (LLMICs, 4.9%; UMICs, 3.9%; HICs, 1.5%; P < 0.001) exhibited an inverse economic gradient. Conclusion Patients with NSTEMI in LLMICs present with fewer comorbidities but a more advanced stage of acute disease, and have worse outcomes compared with HICs. A cardiovascular health narrative is needed to address this inequity across economic boundaries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)552-563
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Volume9
Issue number6
Early online date3 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Country income
  • Mortality
  • NSTEMI
  • Quality indicators
  • Registry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Presentation, care, and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to World Bank country income classification: The ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI Registry of the European Society of Cardiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this