Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): Checklist, explanation, and elaboration

  • J. rémie F. Cohen
  • , Jonathan J. Deeks
  • , Lotty Hooft
  • , Jean-Paul Salameh
  • , Daniël A. Korevaar
  • , Constantine Gatsonis
  • , Sally Hopewell
  • , Harriet A. Hunt
  • , Chris J. Hyde
  • , Mariska M. Leeflang
  • , Petra MacAskill
  • , Trevor A. McGrath
  • , David Moher
  • , Johannes B. Reitsma
  • , Anne W. S. Rutjes
  • , Yemisi Takwoingi
  • , Marcello Tonelli
  • , Penny Whiting
  • , Brian H. Willis
  • , Brett Thombs
  • Patrick M. Bossuyt, Matthew D. F. McInnes*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology (EPOPé) Research Team, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics U1153, Inserm, Université de Paris, Paris, France
  • University of Birmingham
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • University of Ottawa
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Brown University
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Exeter
  • Amsterdam Public Health
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of Bern
  • University of Calgary
  • Population Health Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • McGill University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For many users of the biomedical literature, abstracts may be the only source of information about a study. Hence, abstracts should allow readers to evaluate the objectives, key design features, and main results of the study. Several evaluations have shown deficiencies in the reporting of journal and conference abstracts across study designs and research fields, including systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Incomplete reporting compromises the value of research to key stakeholders. The authors of this article have developed a 12 item checklist of preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts). This article presents the checklist, examples of complete reporting, and explanations for each item of PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbern265
JournalBMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Volume372
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts): Checklist, explanation, and elaboration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this