Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prediction of inpatient mortality in hospitalised children in low- and middle-income countries: An external validation of paediatric mortality risk scores

  • Daniella Brals*
  • , Ananda Pradhan
  • , Amelie von Saint Andre-von Arnim
  • , Assaf P. Oron
  • , Moses Ngari
  • , Narshion Ngao
  • , Ezekiel Mupere
  • , Mohammod J. Chisti
  • , Christopher Lwanga
  • , Farzana Afroze
  • , Robert Bandsma
  • , Judd L. Walson
  • , James A. Berkley
  • , Wieger Voskuijl
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Amsterdam
  • University of Washington
  • Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition Network (CHAIN)
  • Wellcome Trust Research Laboratories Nairobi
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh
  • Makerere University
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Oxford
  • Kamuzu University of Health Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Risk prediction tools for acutely ill children have been developed in high- and low-income settings, but few are validated or incorporated into clinical guidelines. We aimed to assess the performance of existing paediatric early warning scores for use in low- and middle-income countries using clinical data from a recent large multi-country study in Africa and South-Asia. Methods We used data (children across three nutritional strata) from the Childhood Acute Illness and Nutrition (CHAIN) Network cohort study (n = 3101). We assessed 10 scores where similar predictor variables were available in the CHAIN cohort. We evaluated performance using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) (primary outcome), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio (secondary outcomes). Results Most scores showed poor discrimination, and all scores had low sensitivity. The paediatric early death index for Africa (AUC = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.77–0.83), respiratory index of severity in children (AUC = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.74–0.81), and respiratory index of severity in children in Malawi (AUC = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.75–0.82) showed acceptable/good overall discrimination. Among children without wasting, most scores had acceptable/good performance, some even excellent. Poor discrimination was found for most scores among children with moderate and severe wasting or kwashiorkor. Conclusions All scores demonstrated lower validation performance than originally reported. Among children without wasting, most risk prediction scores performed acceptably whilst in malnourished children they performed poorly. There is a need for a malnutrition specific score. Further research is needed on specific actions in responding to scores. Integration into future guidelines will require acknowledging staffing, resources and workflows.
Original languageEnglish
Article number04235
JournalJournal of global health
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of inpatient mortality in hospitalised children in low- and middle-income countries: An external validation of paediatric mortality risk scores'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this