Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting Cycling Performance Before and After Training: Insights From Machine Learning Using Small Samples

  • Luuk Vos
  • , Renske N. Vergeer
  • , Richie P. Goulding
  • , Guido Weide
  • , Jos J. de Koning
  • , Richard T. Jaspers
  • , Stephan van der Zwaard*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research on optimizing sports performance is challenging due to large individual variability and small sample sizes. Machine learning (ML) is underexplored in predicting performance changes following training interventions. This study aimed to predict 4-km cycling performance before and after a 12-week intervention using ML models, incorporating physiological, training load, and well-being data while identifying key predictors. Twenty-seven recreational cyclists completed baseline tests, including 4-km time-trial, (Formula presented.) O2max, pulmonary (Formula presented.) O2-kinetics, Wingate, squat jump, ultrasound imaging, and anthropometry. They were randomly assigned to one of four training programs. ML models (generalized linear models (glm), random forest (rf), and principal component regression (pcr)) were used to predict performance pre- and post-training, as well as performance changes. Models were evaluated using R2 and mean absolute error (MAE). Cyclists produced 4.1 ± 0.7 W/kg during the time-trial. Change in cycling performance showed substantial individual variability and did not differ between training programs (p >.05). ML models accurately predicted performance pre-training (R2 = 0.875, MAE = 0.260 W/kg) and post-training (R2 = 0.792, MAE = 0.266 W/kg) using glm, but changes in performance were less predictable. Key predictors included power at (Formula presented.) O2max, ventilatory thresholds, body composition, deoxygenation, sleep, and sickness. Findings highlight ML’s potential for predicting endurance performance but indicate difficulty in forecasting individual adaptations to training.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2565167
JournalAPPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting Cycling Performance Before and After Training: Insights From Machine Learning Using Small Samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this