Abstract
Postponement of menses is widely practised by women using oral contraceptives. One-hundred volunteers, consisting of three groups of women, each group using a different extensively used contraceptive regimen, were tested and compared. The test period consisted mainly of a double (monophasics) or extended (triphasics) pill cycle without a tablet-free interval. Based on daily records of vaginal bleedings as well as on the results of a questionnaire, it could be concluded that postponement of the withdrawal bleeding for twenty extra days was generally effective; the occurrence of the bleedings was related to the duration of postponement of menses and to the contraceptive regimen that was used. However, the introduction of a seven-week cycle pill is not yet a promising alternative since the majority of the volunteers preferred the inconvenience of a monthly withdrawal bleeding. © 1987.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 199-205 |
| Journal | Contraception |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1987 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Postponement of withdrawal bleeding in women using low-dose combined oral contraceptives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver