TY - JOUR
T1 - Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 to Identify Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
AU - Salvadó, Gemma
AU - Janelidze, Shorena
AU - Bali, Divya
AU - Dolado, Anna Orduña
AU - Therriault, Joseph
AU - Brum, Wagner S.
AU - Pichet Binette, Alexa
AU - Stomrud, Erik
AU - Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas
AU - Palmqvist, Sebastian
AU - Coomans, Emma M.
AU - Teunissen, Charlotte E.
AU - van der Flier, Wiesje M.
AU - Rahmouni, Nesrine
AU - Benzinger, Tammie L. S.
AU - Gispert, Juan Domingo
AU - Blennow, Kaj
AU - Doré, Vincent
AU - Feizpour, Azadeh
AU - Rowe, Christopher C.
AU - Alcolea, Daniel
AU - Fortea, Juan
AU - Villeneuve, Sylvia
AU - Johnson, Sterling C.
AU - Rosa-Neto, Pedro
AU - Petersen, Ronald C.
AU - Jack, Clifford R.
AU - Schindler, Suzanne E.
AU - Suárez-Calvet, Marc
AU - Ossenkoppele, Rik
AU - Hansson, Oskar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/11/10
Y1 - 2025/11/10
N2 - Importance: Advances in Alzheimer disease (AD) have shifted research focus to earlier disease stages, necessitating more scalable approaches to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. Objective: To assess the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) for classifying Aβ status in cognitively unimpaired individuals, both as a stand-alone test and in a 2-step approach where positive plasma results were confirmed using a second modality (Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional cohort study used data collected between June 2009 and March 2024. We included 2916 cognitively unimpaired participants from 12 international independent observational cohorts in the US, Europe, Australia, and Canada with available plasma p-tau217 levels and CSF or PET Aβ biomarkers. Performance comparisons between mass spectrometry and immunoassay-based p-tau217 measurements were also performed (n = 964). Exposures: Plasma p-tau217 levels measured by immunoassay. Main Outcome and Measures: Aβ status, determined by CSF or Aβ PET biomarkers. Results: Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.9 (9.9) years; 971 (33.3%) were Aβ positive by either CSF or PET, 1667 (57.2%) were women, and 1108 (38.1%) carried at least 1 APOE ϵ4 allele. As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124. Immunoassays demonstrated comparable PPVs to mass spectrometry (80% [95% CI, 74-86] vs 85% [95% CI, 81-90]; P =.12) but significantly lower overall accuracy (82% [95% CI, 79-84]% vs 88 [95% CI, 86-90]; P <.001) and true Aβ-positive detection rate (49% [95% CI, 43-55] vs 69% [95% CI, 64-75]; P <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings highlight the potential of plasma p-tau217 as a stand-alone test - or when used in a sequential 2-step approach alongside PET or CSF testing - as a cost-effective, scalable, and minimally burdensome strategy for identifying preclinical AD. Tailored screening workflows that incorporate p-tau217 can improve efficiency in participant selection for preclinical AD trials and, in the future, help guide access to disease-modifying treatments..
AB - Importance: Advances in Alzheimer disease (AD) have shifted research focus to earlier disease stages, necessitating more scalable approaches to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. Objective: To assess the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) for classifying Aβ status in cognitively unimpaired individuals, both as a stand-alone test and in a 2-step approach where positive plasma results were confirmed using a second modality (Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional cohort study used data collected between June 2009 and March 2024. We included 2916 cognitively unimpaired participants from 12 international independent observational cohorts in the US, Europe, Australia, and Canada with available plasma p-tau217 levels and CSF or PET Aβ biomarkers. Performance comparisons between mass spectrometry and immunoassay-based p-tau217 measurements were also performed (n = 964). Exposures: Plasma p-tau217 levels measured by immunoassay. Main Outcome and Measures: Aβ status, determined by CSF or Aβ PET biomarkers. Results: Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.9 (9.9) years; 971 (33.3%) were Aβ positive by either CSF or PET, 1667 (57.2%) were women, and 1108 (38.1%) carried at least 1 APOE ϵ4 allele. As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124. Immunoassays demonstrated comparable PPVs to mass spectrometry (80% [95% CI, 74-86] vs 85% [95% CI, 81-90]; P =.12) but significantly lower overall accuracy (82% [95% CI, 79-84]% vs 88 [95% CI, 86-90]; P <.001) and true Aβ-positive detection rate (49% [95% CI, 43-55] vs 69% [95% CI, 64-75]; P <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings highlight the potential of plasma p-tau217 as a stand-alone test - or when used in a sequential 2-step approach alongside PET or CSF testing - as a cost-effective, scalable, and minimally burdensome strategy for identifying preclinical AD. Tailored screening workflows that incorporate p-tau217 can improve efficiency in participant selection for preclinical AD trials and, in the future, help guide access to disease-modifying treatments..
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021289298
U2 - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217
DO - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217
M3 - Article
C2 - 40952756
SN - 2168-6149
VL - 82
SP - 1122
EP - 1134
JO - JAMA Neurology
JF - JAMA Neurology
IS - 11
ER -