Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Plasma ESR1 mutations and outcome to first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients with advanced ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

  • M. K. Bos*
  • , S. W. Lam
  • , G. Motta
  • , J. C. A. Helmijr
  • , C. M. Beaufort
  • , E. de Jonge
  • , J. W. M. Martens
  • , E. Boven
  • , M. P. H. M. Jansen
  • , A. Jager
  • , S. Sleijfer
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
  • Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam and VU Medical Center
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Mediterranean Institute of Oncology
  • University of Catania
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: ESR1 mutations have been identified as mechanism for endocrine resistance and are also associated with a decreased overall survival. We assessed ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for impact on outcome to taxane-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer patients. Methods: ESR1 mutations were determined in archived plasma samples from patients treated with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (AT arm, N = 91) in the randomized phase II ATX study. Samples collected at baseline (n = 51) and at cycle 2 (n = 13, C2) were analyzed using a breast cancer next-generation sequencing panel. This study was powered to detect a benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) at six months for patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab compared to historical trials with fulvestrant. PFS, overall survival (OS), and ctDNA dynamics were exploratory analyses. Results: PFS at six months was 86% (18/21) in patients with an ESR1 mutation detected and 85% (23/27) in wildtype ESR1 patients. In our exploratory analysis, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months [95% CI, 7.6–8.8] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 8.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.3–9.2] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.47]. The median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months [95% CI, 6.6–33.7] for ESR1 mutant patients versus 28.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.3–36.9] for ESR1 wildtype patients [p = 0.27]. Patients with ≥ two ESR1 mutations had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS, compared to those who did not [p = 0.003]. Change in ctDNA level at C2 was not different between ESR1 and other mutations. Conclusions: Presence of ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA might not be associated with inferior PFS and OS in advanced breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-279
Number of pages9
JournalBreast cancer research and treatment
Volume200
Issue number2
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bevacizumab
  • ESR1 mutation
  • HR +/HER2- advanced breast cancer
  • Paclitaxel
  • ctDNA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Plasma ESR1 mutations and outcome to first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients with advanced ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this