Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay in comparison to the heparin-induced platelet activation assay for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

  • Romy T. Meier
  • , Anne-Tess Jolink
  • , Michelle Kempe
  • , Brian R. Curtis
  • , Suzanne Hofstede-van Egmond
  • , Masja de Haas
  • , Leendert Porcelijn
  • , Rick Kapur*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Amsterdam
  • BloodCenter of Wisconsin
  • Sanquin Diagnostic Services
  • Leiden University
  • Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The presence of antibodies against heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes is a key indicator for HIT. Diagnostic laboratory testing generally includes detection of anti-heparin/PF4 and/or functional testing such as the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPAA). However, current functional tests are time-consuming and require specific technical skills. The PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) is a flow cytometry-based test that evaluates activation of donor platelets in the presence of HIT patient serum. Methods: We conducted the PEA with 23 patient sera that were positive in both the anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HIPAA and 26 sera that tested negative in the anti-PF4/heparin ELISA. We next compared the PEA to the HIPAA using a retrospective clinical cohort of 195 sera of suspected HIT patients and tested the reproducibility of the PEA. Results: The PEA was found to have a sensitivity of 73.9% and a specificity of 73.1% compared to the HIPAA. In our retrospective clinical cohort, we found that 74.4% (145 out of 195 samples) had identical results in both the HIPAA and PEA, with a specificity of 64.94% and sensitivity of 80.51% for the PEA compared to the HIPAA. Reproducibility testing of the PEA across three independent runs demonstrated consistent results in 83.3% (30 out of 36 samples). Discussion: These findings suggest that the PEA is a promising functional test for HIT laboratory diagnostics based on the relatively high sensitivity; however, further studies are needed to validate its clinical applicability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)848-850
Number of pages3
JournalTransfusion
Volume65
Issue number5
Early online date2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay in comparison to the heparin-induced platelet activation assay for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this