Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pesticide lifecycle management in agriculture and public health: Where are the gaps?

  • Henk van den Berg
  • , Baogen Gu
  • , Beatrice Grenier
  • , Eva Kohlschmid
  • , Samira Al-Eryani
  • , Haroldo Sergio da Silva Bezerra
  • , Bhupender N. Nagpal
  • , Emmanuel Chanda
  • , Elkhan Gasimov
  • , Raman Velayudhan
  • , Rajpal S. Yadav*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
  • Pan American Health Organization
  • WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India
  • WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
  • WHO Regional Office for Europe
  • World Health Organization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Pesticide lifecycle management encompasses a range of elements from legislation, regulation, manufacturing, application, risk reduction, monitoring, and enforcement to disposal of pesticide waste. A survey was conducted in 2017–2018 to describe the contemporary global status of pesticide lifecycle management, to identify where the gaps are found. A three-tiered questionnaire was distributed to government entities in 194 countries. The response rate was 29%, 27% and 48% to the first, second and third part of the questionnaire, respectively. The results showed gaps for most of the selected indicators of pesticide management, suggesting that pesticide efficacy and safety to human health and the environment are likely being compromised at various stages of the pesticide lifecycle, and at varying degrees across the globe. Low-income countries generally had the highest incidence of gaps. Particular shortcomings were deficiencies in pesticide legislation, inadequate capacity for pesticide registration, protection against occupational exposure to pesticides, consumer protection against residues in food, and environmental protection against pesticide contamination. Policy support for, and implementation of, pesticide use-reduction strategies such as integrated pest management and integrated vector management has been inadequate across regions. Priority actions for structural improvement in pesticide lifecycle management are proposed, including pesticide use-reduction strategies, targeted interventions, and resource mobilization.
Original languageEnglish
Article number140598
JournalScience of the total environment
Volume742
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  3. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Keywords

  • Insecticide resistance
  • Lifecycle management
  • Pest control
  • Pesticide management
  • Risk reduction
  • Vector control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pesticide lifecycle management in agriculture and public health: Where are the gaps?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this