TY - JOUR
T1 - Perspectives on T-cell engaging therapies in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma
AU - Bakker, Max
AU - Kuipers, Maria T.
AU - Kersten, Marie Jose
AU - Tonino, Sanne H.
AU - Serroukh, Yasmina I. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/9/1
Y1 - 2025/9/1
N2 - Purpose of review Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) characterized by a relapsing-remitting disease course. A promising novel therapeutic class emerges with T-cell engaging therapies, which include CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and CD3xCD20 directed bispecific antibodies (BsABs). This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of their efficacy and safety along with logistical considerations in relapsed/refractory (r/r) iNHL. Recent findings Several pivotal CAR-T trials have presented impressive response rates and durable remissions in r/r FL, while data in MZL is scarce. CAR-T is given as a single infusion, but requires a complex logistical infrastructure. Different BsAbs have shown favorable efficacy with a lower rate of acute toxicities. Off-the-shelve availability favors its usability, although prolonged administration of BsAbs might impose a substantial burden for patients. Long-term infection risk is a concern for both treatments. Clinical studies that directly compare CAR-T and BsAbs are still lacking. Summary Both CAR-T and BsAbs have demonstrated promising efficacy as treatment modalities in iNHL. Decision making for T-cell engaging therapies should be tailored to patient specific factors and availability. Maturation of follow-up data will further guide evidence-based treatment choices in FL and MZL.
AB - Purpose of review Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) characterized by a relapsing-remitting disease course. A promising novel therapeutic class emerges with T-cell engaging therapies, which include CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and CD3xCD20 directed bispecific antibodies (BsABs). This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of their efficacy and safety along with logistical considerations in relapsed/refractory (r/r) iNHL. Recent findings Several pivotal CAR-T trials have presented impressive response rates and durable remissions in r/r FL, while data in MZL is scarce. CAR-T is given as a single infusion, but requires a complex logistical infrastructure. Different BsAbs have shown favorable efficacy with a lower rate of acute toxicities. Off-the-shelve availability favors its usability, although prolonged administration of BsAbs might impose a substantial burden for patients. Long-term infection risk is a concern for both treatments. Clinical studies that directly compare CAR-T and BsAbs are still lacking. Summary Both CAR-T and BsAbs have demonstrated promising efficacy as treatment modalities in iNHL. Decision making for T-cell engaging therapies should be tailored to patient specific factors and availability. Maturation of follow-up data will further guide evidence-based treatment choices in FL and MZL.
KW - T-cell engaging therapies
KW - bispecific antibodies
KW - chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy
KW - follicular lymphoma
KW - marginal zone lymphoma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008135439
U2 - 10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160
DO - 10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40511598
SN - 1040-8746
VL - 37
SP - 393
EP - 400
JO - Current opinion in oncology
JF - Current opinion in oncology
IS - 5
M1 - 10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160
ER -