Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Personalized E-Coaching in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Mohammed Y. Khanji
  • , Armida Balawon
  • , Redha Boubertakh
  • , Leonard Hofstra
  • , Jagat Narula
  • , Myriam Hunink
  • , Francesca Pugliese
  • , Steffen E. Petersen
  • Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging and Research, United Kingdom
  • Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • , Utrecht, Canada
  • Mount Sinai Heart, United States
  • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Radiology, Rotterdam, Canada
  • Center for Health Decision Sciences, Boston, United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether electronic (e-) coaching, using personalized web-based lifestyle and risk factor counselling with additional email prompts, provides additional risk reduction when added to standard of care (SOC) in individuals at increased risk. METHODS: Between June 2013 and May 2015, 402 participants were allocated 1:1 to e-coaching and SOC versus SOC. Participants free of manifest cardiovascular disease, with internet access, and a 10-year QRISK2 cardiovascular risk of ≥10% were enrolled. Change in oscillometric carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) from baseline to six months was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included change in blood pressure (BP), weight, and risk scores. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Mean (±SD) age was 65.5 (5.6) years with 37% females. Primary outcome data were available for 94%. There was no difference in PWV reductions between e-coaching and standard of care groups (-0.16 m/s vs. -0.25 m/s, 95% confidence interval -0.39 to 0.22, p = 0.56). There were no differences in the improvement between groups for BP, weight, Framingham, or QRISK2 scores. Pulse wave velocity change was more favorable in those with a higher level of education (p = 0.04), but was not associated with age, gender, presence of diabetes, baseline QRISK2 score, or logins to the website. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals at increased cardiovascular risk, a comprehensive 'health check' program modestly reduced future risk. Personalized e-coaching did not provide added risk reduction. Currently there is no evidence to routinely recommend e-coaching in cardiovascular health check programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: HAPPY London ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01911910.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of global health
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personalized E-Coaching in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this