Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: A systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness

  • Mark P. Lamberts
  • , Marjolein Lugtenberg
  • , Maroeska M. Rovers
  • , Anne J. Roukema
  • , Joost P. H. Drenth
  • , Gert P. Westert
  • , Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones, but the exact relationship between cholecystectomies and symptoms still is unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of elective cholecystectomy for patients with cholecystolithiasis in terms of both persistent and de novo symptoms. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed and Embase. The search included studies comprising patients 18 years of age or older undergoing elective cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. The proportions of symptoms after cholecystectomy were calculated and then subdivided into persistent and de novo symptoms. Results: A total of 38 studies reported the presence of postcholecystectomy symptoms. The results showed that upper abdominal pain, the main indication for cholecystectomy in the majority of the patients, mostly disappeared after surgery. However, it persisted in up to 33 % of the patients and arose de novo in up to 14 %. Diarrhea (85 %) and constipation (76 %) were the persistent symptoms most often reported, whereas upper abdominal pain and vomiting were the least often reported. Flatulence (62 %) was the most often reported new symptom. However, large variations in symptoms were found between studies. Conclusions: The review indicates that cholecystectomy often is ineffective with regard to persistent and de novo symptoms. The finding that the types and proportions of persistent symptoms differ from those that arise de novo suggests that this distinction may be useful in predicting which patients would and which would not benefit from a cholecystectomy. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)709-718
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: A systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this