Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient-Reported Outcomes With Consolidation Durvalumab Versus Placebo After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC: Results From the Phase 3 ADRIATIC Trial

  • Silvia Novello*
  • , David R. Spigel
  • , Jian Fang
  • , Yuanbin Chen
  • , Yoshitaka Zenke
  • , Ki Hyeong Lee
  • , Alejandro Navarro
  • , Eva Lotte Buchmeier
  • , John Wen Cheng Chang
  • , Yoshimasa Shiraishi
  • , Mustafa Özgüroğlu
  • , Yu Jung Kim
  • , Nguyen Thi Thai Hoa
  • , Sayed M.S. Hashemi
  • , Anne C. Chiang
  • , Ralph Turner
  • , Helen Mann
  • , Yuka Olivo
  • , Haiyi Jiang
  • , Suresh Senan
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Turin
  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute
  • Peking University
  • Cancer & Hematology Centers of Western Michigan
  • National Cancer Center Japan
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
  • Hospitals of the City of Cologne gGmbH
  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation-LinKou Branch
  • Kyushu University
  • Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa
  • Seoul National University
  • National Cancer Hospital
  • Department of Pulmonary Medicine
  • Yale University
  • IQVIA Inc.
  • AstraZeneca
  • Department of Radiation Oncology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: In the first interim analysis of the phase 3 ADRIATIC trial, consolidation durvalumab significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival (primary end points) versus placebo in patients with limited-stage SCLC without disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. We report the patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Patients received durvalumab, durvalumab-tremelimumab, or placebo every 4 weeks for up to 24 months. Patient-reported global health status/quality of life (QoL), functioning, and symptoms, assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-Core 30-item and QoL Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13-item (secondary end points), are reported for durvalumab and placebo only; the durvalumab-tremelimumab arm remained blinded at this analysis. Change from baseline (for prespecified key scales), time to deterioration (TTD), and improvement rates (all scales) were evaluated. A score change of more than or equal to 10 from baseline was considered a clinically meaningful deterioration or improvement. Analyses were not alpha controlled. Results: In both arms (durvalumab, n = 264; placebo, n = 266), mean score changes in prespecified key scales from baseline up to 24 months were small and not clinically meaningful. There were no between-arm differences in TTD except for arm or shoulder pain (longer with durvalumab versus placebo [median TTD: 25.7 versus 9.1 mo; hazard ratio: 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.94)]) and similar improvement rates between arms for most scales; a higher improvement rate for chest pain was observed with durvalumab versus placebo (odds ratio: 2.28 [95% confidence interval: 1.08–4.95]). Conclusions: Consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy did not compromise patients’ global health status/QoL, functioning, or symptoms versus placebo, further supporting this treatment regimen as the new standard of care for limited-stage SCLC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103564
JournalJournal of thoracic oncology
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • ADRIATIC
  • Consolidation
  • Durvalumab
  • Limited-stage small cell lung cancer
  • Patient-reported outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-Reported Outcomes With Consolidation Durvalumab Versus Placebo After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Limited-Stage SCLC: Results From the Phase 3 ADRIATIC Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this