Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcomes in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-derived pancreatic cancer differ from PanIN-derived pancreatic cancer

  • Joseph R. Habib
  • , Ingmar F. Rompen
  • , Ammar A. Javed
  • , Mahip Grewal
  • , Benedict Kinny-Köster
  • , Paul C. M. Andel
  • , D. Brock Hewitt
  • , Greg D. Sacks
  • , Marc G. Besselink
  • , Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
  • , Lois A. Daamen
  • , Martin Loos
  • , Jin He
  • , Markus W. Büchler
  • , Christopher L. Wolfgang
  • , I. Quintus Molenaar*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • New York University
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Champalimaud Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and Aim: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) management is generally extrapolated from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC guidelines. However, these are biologically divergent, and heterogeneity further exists between tubular and colloid subtypes. Methods: Consecutive upfront surgery patients with PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC were retrospectively identified from international centers (2000–2019). One-to-one propensity score matching for clinicopathologic factors generated three cohorts: IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, tubular IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, and tubular versus colloid IPMN-derived PDAC. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox regression determined corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: The median OS (mOS) in 2350 PanIN-derived and 700 IPMN-derived PDAC patients was 23.0 and 43.1 months (P < 0.001), respectively. PanIN-derived PDAC had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, and nodal status. Tubular subtype had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, nodal status, and R1 margins, with a mOS of 33.7 versus 94.1 months (P < 0.001) in colloid. Matched (n = 495), PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC had mOSs of 30.6 and 42.8 months (P < 0.001), respectively. In matched (n = 341) PanIN-derived and tubular IPMN-derived PDAC, mOS remained poorer (27.7 vs 37.4, P < 0.001). Matched tubular and colloid cancers (n = 112) had similar OS (P = 0.55). On multivariable Cox regression, PanIN-derived PDAC was associated with worse OS than IPMN-derived (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.44–1.90) and tubular IPMN-derived (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.32–1.77) PDAC. Colloid and tubular subtype was not associated with OS (P = 0.16). Conclusions: PanIN-derived PDAC has worse survival than IPMN-derived PDAC supporting distinct outcomes. Although more indolent, colloid IPMN-derived PDAC has similar survival to tubular after risk adjustment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2360-2366
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Volume39
Issue number11
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • colloid
  • intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm
  • invasive IPMN
  • pancreatic cancer
  • pancreatic cyst
  • pancreatic neoplasms
  • tubular

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-derived pancreatic cancer differ from PanIN-derived pancreatic cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this