Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcome of BRCA1- compared with BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer: A nationwide study in the Netherlands

  • P. M. L. H. Vencken
  • , W. Reitsma
  • , M. Kriege
  • , G. H. de Bock
  • , J. A. de Hullu
  • , A. M. van Altena
  • , K. N. Gaarenstroom
  • , H. F. A. Vasen
  • , M. A. Adank
  • , M. K. Schmidt
  • , M. van Beurden
  • , R. P. Zweemer
  • , F. Rijcken
  • , B. F. M. Slangen
  • , C. W. Burger
  • , C. Seynaeve*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Erasmus MC
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumours
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Maastricht UMC+

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggested an improved overall survival (OS) for BRCA2- versus BRCA1-associated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), whereas the impact of chemotherapy is not yet clear. In a nationwide cohort, we examined the results of primary treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-free interval (TFI), and OS of BRCA1 versus BRCA2 EOC patients. Methods: Two hundred and forty-five BRCA1- and 99 BRCA2-associated EOC patients were identified through all Dutch university hospitals. Analyses were carried out with the Pearson's Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression methods. Results: BRCA1 patients were younger at EOC diagnosis than BRCA2 patients (51 versus 55 years; P < 0.001), without differences regarding histology, tumor grade, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. Complete response rates after primary treatment, including chemotherapy, did not differ between BRCA1 (86%) and BRCA2 patients (90%). BRCA1 versus BRCA2 patients had a shorter PFS (median 2.2 versus 3.9 years, respectively; P = 0.006), TFI (median 1.7 versus 2.8 years; P = 0.009), and OS (median 6.0 versus 9.7 years; P = 0.04). Differences could not be explained by age at diagnosis, FIGO stage or type of treatment. Conclusions: PFS and OS were substantially longer in BRCA2- than in BRCA1-associated EOC patients. While response rates after primary treatment were similarly high in both groups, TFI, as surrogate for chemosensitivity, was significantly longer in BRCA2 patients. © The Author 2013.Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2036-2042
JournalAnnals of oncology
Volume24
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome of BRCA1- compared with BRCA2-associated ovarian cancer: A nationwide study in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this