Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcome After Decompressive Craniectomy for Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Timing of the Intervention: Timing of the Intervention

  • Neurosurgical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC-Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Neurology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG), Amsterdam, and Zaans Medical Centre (ZMC), Zaandam, the Netherlands.
  • From the Alzheimer Centre Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Leeuwis, Hooghiemstra, Prins, Scheltens, van der Flier); the Department of Neurology, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Weaver, Biesbroek, Exalto, Biessels)...
  • Academic Medical Centre (AMC)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical guidelines for the treatment of space-occupying hemispheric infarct employ age (≤60 yr) and time elapsed since stroke onset (≤48 h) as decisive criteria whether to perform decompressive craniectomy (DC). However, only few patients in these RCTs underwent DC after 48 h. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between the timing of DC and (un)favorable outcome in patients with space-occupying middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarct undergoing DC. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study from 2007 to 2017. Unfavorable outcome at 1 yr was defined as a Glasgow outcome scale 1 to 3. Additionally, we systematically reviewed the literature up to November 2018, including studies reporting on the timing of DC and other predictors of outcome. We performed Firth penalized likelihood and random-effects meta-analysis with odds ratio (OR) on unfavorable outcome. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were enrolled. A total of 26 (39%) patients achieved favorable and 40 (61%) unfavorable outcomes (13 [20%] died). DC after 48 h since stroke diagnosis did not significantly increase the risk of unfavorable outcome (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.3-2.3). Also, in the meta-analysis, DC after 48 h of stroke onset was not associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcome (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.89-1.38). CONCLUSION: The outcome of DC performed after 48 h in patients with malignant MCA infarct was not worse than the outcome of DC performed within 48 h. Contrary to current guidelines, we, therefore, advocate not to set a restriction of ≤48 h on the time elapsed since stroke onset in the decision whether to perform DC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E318-E325
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume86
Issue number3
Early online date15 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Decompressive craniectomy
  • Ischemic stroke
  • Outcome
  • Prognosis
  • Timing of surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome After Decompressive Craniectomy for Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction: Timing of the Intervention: Timing of the Intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this