Abstract
For cytoarchitectonic delineation of cortical areas in human brain, the Gallyas staining for somata with its sharp contrast between cell bodies and neuropil is preferable to the classical Nissl staining, the more so when an image analysis sYstem is used. This Gallyas staining, however, does not appear to be appropriate for counting neuron numbers in pertinent brain areas, due to the lack of distinct cytological features between small neurons and glial cells. For cell counting Nissl is preferable. In an optimal design for cell counting at least both the Gallyas and the Nissl staining must be applied, the former staining for cytoarchitectural delineaton of cortical areas and the latter for counting the number of neurons in the pertinent cortical areas.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 439-445 |
| Journal | NeuroImage |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal staining methods for delineation of cortical areas and neuron counts in human brains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver