Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimal Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Definitive Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

  • Nicholas G. Zaorsky
  • , Yilun Sun
  • , Abdenour Nabid
  • , Almudena Zapatero
  • , Michel Bolla
  • , David Joseph
  • , Philippe Maingon
  • , Araceli Guerrero
  • , Ana Alvarez Gonzalez
  • , Carmen Gonzalez San-Segundo
  • , Maria Ángeles Cabeza Rodríguez
  • , Josep Maria Sole
  • , Agustí Pedro Olivé
  • , Allison Steigler
  • , Luis Souhami
  • , Nathalie Carrier
  • , John G. Armstrong
  • , Charles Gillham
  • , Thomas M. Pisansky
  • , Matthew Schipper
  • Howard M. Sandler, Jason A. Efstathiou, Colleen Lawton, Theo M. de Reijke, Gerhardt Attard, Soumyajit Roy, Scott C. Morgan, Shawn Malone, William A. Hall, Paul L. Nguyen, Jonathan E. Shoag, Randy A. Vince, Adam Calaway, Jorge A. Garcia, Pedro C. Barata, Prateek Mendiratta, Jason R. Brown, Luca Valle, Matthew Rettig, Robert T. Dess, William C. Jackson, Ting Martin, Angela Y. Jia, Michael Steinberg, Tahmineh Romero, Amar U. Kishan, Daniel E. Spratt*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
  • Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
  • CHU de Grenoble
  • University of Western Australia
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Hospital Universitari de Terrassa
  • Hospital Plató
  • University of Newcastle
  • McGill University
  • St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Harvard University
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University College London
  • Rush University
  • University of Ottawa
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Importance The ideal duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for treating localized prostate cancer is unknown due to variable adherence and treatment durations tested in clinical trials. Objective To determine the ideal duration of ADT for patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. Data Sources This individual patient data meta-analysis of 13 randomized phase 3 clinical trials evaluated the use of radiotherapy alone or with ADT. It included patients with a median follow-up of 11.3 (IQR, 9.5-14.5) years and ADT duration of 0 to 36 months. Most patients (7392 [72%]) included had National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk or very high-risk disease. Study Selection For this meta-analysis, a systematic literature search from 1980 to 2020 was performed in trial registries (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov), MEDLINE (1966-2020), Embase (1982-2020), Web of Science, and Scopus to identify trials. Data Extraction and Synthesis Intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses were performed. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 distant metastasis at 10 years was calculated based on prognostic risk group. The analyses were conducted from January 5 to August 15, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point for this study was overall survival, defined as time to death or last follow-up from randomization. Secondary end points included biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer–specific mortality, and other-cause mortality. Results The median (IQR) age among the 10 266 male patients was 70 (65-74) years. Longer durations of ADT were associated with nonlinear improvement in relative benefits of DM, prostate cancer–specific mortality, and overall survival, with reduced estimated benefits beyond 9 to 12 months of ADT based on the end point. There was a near-linear increase in other-cause mortality associated with long-term ADT use (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.09-1.50; P = .002 for 28 vs 0 months of ADT). The optimal ADT duration based on 10-year DM was 0, 6, 12 months, and undefined for patients with 1 intermediate-risk factor, 2 or more intermediate-risk factors, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk and very high-risk disease, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this meta-analysis suggest that, for men with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy and ADT, there are relative and absolute benefits from increasing durations of ADT that help provide individualized risk estimates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-65
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA oncology
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Definitive Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this