Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

One-Year Safety and Performance of a Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker

  • Reinoud E. Knops*
  • , James E. Ip
  • , Rahul Doshi
  • , Derek V. Exner
  • , Pascal Defaye
  • , Robert Canby
  • , Maria Grazia Bongiorni
  • , Morio Shoda
  • , Gerhard Hindricks
  • , Petr Neužil
  • , Mayer Rashtian
  • , Karel T. N. Breeman
  • , Jordan R. Nevo
  • , Leonard Ganz
  • , Chris Hubbard
  • , Anu Bulusu
  • , Vivek Y. Reddy
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Emma Center for Personalized Medicine
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • HonorHealth, Arizona
  • Foothills Medical Centre
  • CHU de Grenoble
  • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute
  • San Rossore Private Hospital
  • Tokyo Women's Medical University
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
  • Na Homolce Hospital
  • Huntington Hospital
  • Abbott Medical
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

91 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker can provide bradycardia therapy to most patients with pacemaker indications without the complications associated with a lead or pulse generator. We sought to confirm whether previously reported 3-month safety and performance outcomes were sustained through 12 months by determining whether 12-month complication-free and performance success rates exceeded their prespecified performance goals. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in the prospective, single-group Aveir DR i2i Study if they had a standard indication for dual-chamber pacing. Enrolled patients were implanted with an Aveir DR dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system, which comprised 2 communicating leadless pacemakers (1 in the right atrium and 1 in the right ventricle). The primary safety outcome evaluated whether freedom from serious device- or procedure-related events through 365 days exceeded the predetermined performance goal of 76.5%. The primary performance outcome determined whether the composite of atrial capture threshold (≤3.0 V at 0.4 ms) and sensing amplitude (P-wave ≥1.0 mV) at the 12-month visit exceeded the predetermined performance goal of 80.0%. RESULTS: Sites attempted implantation in 300 subjects, where 63.3% had sinus-node dysfunction and 33.3% had atrioventricular block as their primary pacing indication. The primary safety end point was achieved, with a Kaplan-Meier 12-month complication-free rate of 88.6% (95% CI, 84.5-91.8; P<0.001). The primary performance end point was achieved in 92.8% of patients (95% CI, 89.7-95.8; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both primary safety and performance end points were met after 1 year, demonstrating consistency with previously reported 3-month outcomes of a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05252702.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere013619
JournalCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology
Volume18
Issue number4
Early online date2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • bradycardia
  • goals
  • heart atria
  • heart ventricles
  • humans
  • pacemaker, artificial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One-Year Safety and Performance of a Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this