TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncologic safety and technical feasibility of completion transanal total mesorectal excision after local excision; a cohort study from the International TaTME Registry
AU - Dingemans, Siem A.
AU - Kreisel, Saskia I.
AU - Rutgers, Marieke L. W.
AU - Musters, Gijsbert D.
AU - Hompes, Roel
AU - Brown, Carl J.
AU - on behalf of the International TaTME Registry Collaborative
AU - Greg, Wynn
AU - Albert, Wolthuis
AU - Helmut, Weiss
AU - Henk, Wegstapel
AU - Satish, Warrier
AU - Yves, Vannieuwenhove
AU - Jurriaan, Tuynman
AU - Jean-Jacques, Tuech
AU - Erik, Syk
AU - Peter, Struder
AU - Antonio, Spinelli
AU - Amy, Siu Yan Kok
AU - Vicente, Simo Fernandez
AU - Pierpaolo, Sileri
AU - Collin, Sietses
AU - Gerald, Seitinger
AU - Nirooshun, Rajendran
AU - Imma, Prós Ribas
AU - de, Pooter Karl
AU - Frank, Pfeffer
AU - Rodrigo, Perez
AU - Miguel, Pera
AU - Paul, Pattyn
AU - Yves, Panis
AU - Alex, Ochsner
AU - Andrea, Muratore
AU - Isacco, Montroni
AU - Yevgen, Miroshnychenko
AU - Mónica, Millán Scheiding
AU - Saulius, Mikalauskas
AU - Arend, Merrie
AU - Kathryn, McCarthy
AU - Nirvana, Maroni
AU - Paul, Mackey
AU - Deborah, Nicol
AU - Sender, Liberman
AU - Emanuele, Lezoche
AU - Antonio, Lacy Fortuni
AU - Dae, Kyung Sohn
AU - Stephan, Korsgen
AU - Mavrantonis, Konstantinos
AU - Werner, Kneist
AU - Shane, Killeen
AU - Mark, Karoty
AU - Dringrid, Haunold
AU - Dieter, Hahnloser
AU - Jan, Grosek
AU - Tomas, Grolich
AU - Markus, Gloeckler
AU - Ethem, Gecim
AU - Adrián, Ezequiel Mattacheo
AU - Pascal, Doornebosch
AU - Pieter, D. ’Hooge
AU - Paolo, Delrio
AU - Francois, Dagbert
AU - Dimitri, Christoforidis
AU - Marco, Caricato
AU - Kenneth, Cambell
AU - Liliana, Bordeianou
AU - Stefano, Berti
AU - Carl, Brown
AU - Willem, Bemelman
AU - Balázs, B. nky
AU - Dib, Bandyopadhyay
AU - Sam, Atallah
AU - Kamal, Aryal
AU - Steve, Arnold
AU - Felix, Aigner
AU - Michel, Adamina
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: As part of an organ sparing strategy, a surgical local excision may be performed in patients with early-stage rectal cancer or following neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. In selected cases, a completion total mesorectal excision may be recommended which can be more complex because of the preceding local excision. A transanal approach to perform completion total mesorectal excision may offer an advantage through the better visualization of the surgical field in the distal rectum and less forceful retraction for exposure. However, the oncologic safety and technical feasibility of this approach have yet to be demonstrated in these patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological and technical safety of completion transanal total mesorectal excision following a local excision in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: Patients from the prospective International Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Registry who underwent a surgical local excision prior to completion transanal total mesorectal excision were retrospectively analyzed. Results: In total, 189 patients were included of which 22% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. In 94% of the patients, a low anterior resection was performed. A primary anastomosis was constructed in 91% (n = 171/189) of the patients, with the majority also receiving a defunctioning stoma (84%, n = 144/171), of which 69% (n = 100/144) were reversed. Within 30 days, 7% developed an anastomotic leakage. The two-year local recurrence rate was 5% (n = 5/104) with an estimated rate of 3% (95% CI 0–7%). Two-year disease-free survival was 85% (n = 88/104) and overall survival was 95% (n = 99/104). Conclusions: Transanal completion total mesorectal excision following local excision for rectal cancer is oncologically safe, with low complication rates and high restorative rates.
AB - Background: As part of an organ sparing strategy, a surgical local excision may be performed in patients with early-stage rectal cancer or following neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. In selected cases, a completion total mesorectal excision may be recommended which can be more complex because of the preceding local excision. A transanal approach to perform completion total mesorectal excision may offer an advantage through the better visualization of the surgical field in the distal rectum and less forceful retraction for exposure. However, the oncologic safety and technical feasibility of this approach have yet to be demonstrated in these patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological and technical safety of completion transanal total mesorectal excision following a local excision in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: Patients from the prospective International Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Registry who underwent a surgical local excision prior to completion transanal total mesorectal excision were retrospectively analyzed. Results: In total, 189 patients were included of which 22% received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. In 94% of the patients, a low anterior resection was performed. A primary anastomosis was constructed in 91% (n = 171/189) of the patients, with the majority also receiving a defunctioning stoma (84%, n = 144/171), of which 69% (n = 100/144) were reversed. Within 30 days, 7% developed an anastomotic leakage. The two-year local recurrence rate was 5% (n = 5/104) with an estimated rate of 3% (95% CI 0–7%). Two-year disease-free survival was 85% (n = 88/104) and overall survival was 95% (n = 99/104). Conclusions: Transanal completion total mesorectal excision following local excision for rectal cancer is oncologically safe, with low complication rates and high restorative rates.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85212178710
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-024-11390-w
DO - 10.1007/s00464-024-11390-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 39663245
SN - 0930-2794
JO - Surgical endoscopy
JF - Surgical endoscopy
M1 - e2036330
ER -