Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Occupational skin diseases: actual state analysis of patient management pathways in 28 European countries

  • V. Mahler*
  • , K. Aalto-Korte
  • , J. H. Alfonso
  • , J. G. Bakker
  • , A. Bauer
  • , L. Bensefa-Colas
  • , A. Boman
  • , J. Bourke
  • , M. Bubaš
  • , P. Bulat
  • , J. Chaloupka
  • , L. Constandt
  • , T. E. Danielsen
  • , R. Darlenski
  • , A. Dugonik
  • , K. Ettler
  • , A. Gimenez-Arnau
  • , M. Gonçalo
  • , J. D. Johansen
  • , S. M. John
  • M. Kiec-Swierczynska, P. Koch, V. Kohánka, B. Krecisz, F. Larese Filon, S. Ljubojević, J. Macan, B. Marinović, M. Matura, P. W. Mihatsch, D. Mijakoski, J. Minov, J. Pace, M. Pesonen, J. M. Ramada Rodilla, H. Rast, V. Reljic, C. Salavastru, C. Schuster, M. L. Schuttelaar, D. Simon, R. Spiewak, R. Jurakic Tončić, S. Urbanček, S. Valiukevičienė, P. Weinert, M. Wilkinson, W. Uter
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Paul-Ehrlich-Institut
  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
  • National Institute of Occupational Health
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
  • Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu AP-HP
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University College Cork
  • Croatian Institute for Health Protection and Safety at Work
  • University of Belgrade
  • Charles University
  • University of Leuven (KULeuven) and FEDRIS (Federal Agency for Occupational Risks)
  • Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority
  • Trakia University
  • University of Ljubljana
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • University of Coimbra
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Osnabrück University
  • Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
  • Kirchberg Hospital
  • Dermatological Specialist Consultation of the Medical Department at the National Labour Office
  • Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce
  • University of Trieste
  • University of Zagreb
  • Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health
  • SLSO
  • Institute of Occupational Health of RNM, WHO Collaborating Center, 1000, Skopje, North Macedonia
  • University of Malta
  • Pompeu Fabra University
  • SUVA
  • Clinical Center of Serbia
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Medical University of Graz
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
  • University of Bern
  • Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
  • Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou F.D. Roosevelta Banska Bystrica
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Université Paris 5
  • Federal Agency for Occupational Risks (FEDRIS)
  • The Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority
  • WHO Collaborating Center
  • Jagiellonian University in Kraków
  • Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation
  • Leeds General Infirmary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Work-related skin diseases (WSD) are caused or worsened by a professional activity. Occupational skin diseases (OSD) need to fulfil additional legal criteria which differ from country to country. OSD range amongst the five most frequently notified occupational diseases (musculoskeletal diseases, neurologic diseases, lung diseases, diseases of the sensory organs, skin diseases) in Europe. Objective: To retrieve information and compare the current state of national frameworks and pathways to manage patients with occupational skin disease with regard to prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation in different European countries. Methods: A questionnaire-based survey of the current situation regarding OSD patient management pathways was carried out with experts on occupational dermatology and/or occupational medicine from 28 European countries contributing to the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action TD 1206 (StanDerm) (www.standerm.eu). Results: Besides a national health service or a statutory health insurance, most European member states implemented a second insurance scheme specifically geared at occupational diseases [insurance against occupational risks (synonyms: insurance against work accidents and occupational injuries; statutory social accident insurance)]. Legal standards for the assessment of occupationally triggered diseases with a genetic background differ between different countries, however, in most European member states recognition as OSD is possible. In one-third of the countries UV light-induced tumours can be recognized as OSD under specific conditions. Conclusion: OSD definitions vary between European countries and are not directly comparable, which hampers comparisons between statistics collected in different countries. Awareness of this fact and further efforts for standardization are necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-30
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Occupational skin diseases: actual state analysis of patient management pathways in 28 European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this