Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

No efficacy of anti-IL-23 therapy for axial spondyloarthritis in randomised controlled trials but in post-hoc analyses of psoriatic arthritis-related 'physician-reported spondylitis'?

  • Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
  • Zuyderland Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The three monoclonal antibodies ustekinumab, guselkumab and risankizumab targeting the p 40 or the 19 subunit of interleukin -23 have now been approved for the indication psoriasis and the former two also for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Ustekinumab and risankizumab have appeared ineffective in randomised controlled trials with patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but post-hoc analyses of PsA trials have now suggested that they may improve back pain symptoms potentially induced by axial inflammation based on PsA. Here we argue that, based on the absence of efficacy in axSpA, this is unlikely and more probably due to generic, non-specific effects, which are not adequately covered by the tools developed for the assessment of inflammation in axSpA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)466-468
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of the rheumatic diseases
Volume81
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • ankylosing
  • antirheumatic agents
  • arthritis
  • biological therapy
  • cytokines
  • psoriatic
  • spondylitis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No efficacy of anti-IL-23 therapy for axial spondyloarthritis in randomised controlled trials but in post-hoc analyses of psoriatic arthritis-related 'physician-reported spondylitis'?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this