Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

No Difference Between Open and Arthroscopic ATFL Repair, Both Yielding Clinically Significant Improvement in Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • CAISR Trial Study Group
  • Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne
  • Xpert Clinics Orthopaedics
  • The Netherlands
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Spaarnegasthuis
  • Hoofddorp
  • Aging & Vitality and Sports
  • ACES (Academic Centre for Evidence-based Sports medicine), Netherlands
  • Amsterdam Collaboration on Health & Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Australian IOC Research Centre
  • University of Minho
  • Programs Sports and Musculoskeletal Health
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Breda Amphia, Breda, Netherlands
  • Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital
  • Flevoziekenhuis Almere
  • Utrecht
  • Albert Schweitzer Hospital
  • Dordrecht/Zwijndrechtl Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • St. Antonius Hospital
  • Centro Hospitalar Póvoa de Varzim-Vila do Conde

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Lateral ligament repair is a reliable surgical approach for the treatment of chronic ankle instability (CAI). Although the open technique has shown success over time, technological advancements have enabled the increasing use of arthroscopic techniques, with the expectation of improving results. The objective of the current trial was to compare the results of open and arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair in patients with CAI. Hypothesis: Arthroscopic anatomic repair would lead to superior functional outcome as measured by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) compared with open anatomic repair. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients at 6 participating sites were included if they were age 16 years or older, had a history of ankle inversion sprain, had symptoms ≥6 months, and had mechanical ankle instability. Randomization was performed over open and arthroscopic ATFL repair, with or without retinacular augmentation. Both procedures were performed using all-suture anchors and corresponding instrumentation. The primary outcome measure was functional outcome as measured by the FAOS at 24 months of follow-up. Results: A total of 41 patients were included: 21 patients in the open repair group and 20 patients in the arthroscopic repair group. The mean ± SD age of the patients at the time of surgery was 32 ± 13 years. No statistically significant difference was found between treatment groups for any of the FAOS subscales at any of the follow-up intervals. Both groups showed statistically significant score improvements across all FAOS subscales (P < .005). Complications were reported in 4 patients (18%) in the open surgery group (infection, swelling, deep venous thrombosis, adhesion) and 1 patient (5%) in the arthroscopy group (neurogenic pain) (P = .343). In both groups, 1 resprain was reported (5%). Conclusion: Open and arthroscopic ATFL repairs equally achieved statistically significant improvement in functional outcome and effectively addressed functional and mechanical ankle instability. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov database (reference NCT02998333) and the Dutch trial registry (NL55707.018.16).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23259671261417357
JournalOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026

Keywords

  • ATFL injury
  • ATFL repair
  • ankle instability
  • chronic instability
  • inversion sprain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No Difference Between Open and Arthroscopic ATFL Repair, Both Yielding Clinically Significant Improvement in Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this