Neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer – less is more?

Aim: There is significant international variation in the use of neoadjuvant radiation prior to total mesorectal excision. The MERCURY group advocate selective neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We have performed a retrospective, single-centre study of patients treated with CRT, where only the circumferential resection margin is threatened, with the aim of identifying whether a more selective approach to CRT provides acceptable local relapse rates (LRRs). Method: All consecutive patients who underwent radical surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma over a 5-year period (2007–2012) in the Oxford University Trust were considered. Electronic hospital systems were reviewed to obtain patient and tumour demographics, treatment and follow-up information. All patients were classified into risk categories according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and R. Results: Two hundred and seventy-two patients were identified: 123, 89 and 60 in the high-, intermediate- and low-risk categories, respectively. Seventy-nine per cent of those in the high-risk group, 6% in the intermediate and 5% in the low-risk group underwent CRT. The overall 5-year LRR and distant recurrence rate (DRR) were 5.2% and 17.8%, respectively. The 5-year LRR for those who went straight to surgery was 2.0% and for those who had neoadjuvant CRT it was 7.4%. The DRR for these two groups was 8.5% and 18.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Our series demonstrates that the use of CRT only in margin-threatening tumours, results in an exceptionally low LRR for those without margin-threatening disease. In routine clinical care, this strategy can minimize the significant morbidity of multimodal treatment and allow earlier introduction of systemic therapy to minimize distant recurrence.