Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Natural outdoor environments and mental health: Stress as a possible mechanism

  • Margarita Triguero-Mas*
  • , David Donaire-Gonzalez
  • , Edmund Seto
  • , Antònia Valentín
  • , David Martínez
  • , Graham Smith
  • , Gemma Hurst
  • , Glòria Carrasco-Turigas
  • , Daniel Masterson
  • , Magdalena van den Berg
  • , Albert Ambròs
  • , Tania Martínez-Íñiguez
  • , Audrius Dedele
  • , Naomi Ellis
  • , Tomas Grazulevicius
  • , Martin Voorsmit
  • , Marta Cirach
  • , Judith Cirac-Claveras
  • , Wim Swart
  • , Eddy Clasquin
  • Annemarie Ruijsbroek, Jolanda Maas, Michael Jerret, Regina Gražulevičienė, Hanneke Kruize, Christopher J. Gidlow, Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL)
  • Pompeu Fabra University
  • CIBER - Center for Biomedical Research Network
  • Ramon Llull University
  • University of Washington
  • University of Staffordshire
  • Vytautas Magnus University
  • VU University Medical Center
  • National Institute of Public Health and the Environment
  • University of California at Los Angeles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Better mental health has been associated with exposure to natural outdoor environments (NOE). However, comprehensive studies including several indicators of exposure and outcomes, potential effect modifiers and mediators are scarce. Objectives We used novel, objective measures to explore the relationships between exposure to NOE (i.e. residential availability and contact) and different indicators of mental health, and possible modifiers and mediators. Methods A nested cross-sectional study was conducted in: Barcelona, Spain; Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom; Doetinchem, Netherlands; Kaunas, Lithuania. Participants’ exposure to NOE (including both surrounding greenness and green and/or blue spaces) was measured in terms of (a) amount in their residential environment (using Geographical Information Systems) and (b) their contact with NOE (using smartphone data collected over seven days). Self-reported information was collected for mental health (psychological wellbeing, sleep quality, vitality, and somatisation), and potential effect modifiers (gender, age, education level, and city) and mediators (perceived stress and social contacts), with additional objective NOE physical activity (potential mediator) derived from smartphone accelerometers. Results Analysis of data from 406 participants showed no statistically significant associations linking mental health and residential NOE exposure. However, NOE contact, especially surrounding greenness, was statistically significantly tied to better mental health. There were indications that these relationships were stronger for males, younger people, low-medium educated, and Doetinchem residents. Perceived stress was a mediator of most associations, and physical activity and social contacts were not. Conclusions Our findings indicate that contact with NOE benefits mental health. Our results also suggest that having contact with NOE that can facilitate stress reduction could be particularly beneficial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)629-638
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental research
Volume159
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Green space
  • Mental health
  • Natural outdoor environments
  • Physical activity
  • Social interactions
  • Stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural outdoor environments and mental health: Stress as a possible mechanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this