Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

MRP8/14 and neutrophil elastase for predicting treatment response and occurrence of flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

  • University of Amsterdam
  • Leiden University
  • Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation
  • University of Münster
  • Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Amsterdam, United States
  • Department of Paediatrics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics AUMC...
  • Department of Radiology CS2, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • Department of Blood Cell Research, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Laboratory for Red Blood Cell Diagnostics, Sanquin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • University Children's Hospital Muenster
  • Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Utrecht, Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study two neutrophil activation markers, myeloid-related protein (MRP) 8/14 and neutrophil elastase (NE), for their ability to predict treatment response and flare in patients with JIA. METHODS: Using samples from two cohorts (I and II), we determined MRP8/14 and NE levels of 32 (I) and 81 (II) patients with new-onset, DMARD-naïve arthritis and compared patients who responded to treatment (defined as fulfilling ≥ adjusted ACRpedi50 response and/or inactive disease) with non-responders (defined as fulfilling < adjusted ACRpedi50 response and/or active disease) at 6 and 12 months. Secondly, we compared biomarker levels of 54 (I) and 34 (II) patients with clinically inactive disease who did or did not suffer from a flare of arthritis after 6 or 12 months. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were carried out to study the predictive value of MRP8/14 and NE for treatment response and flare. RESULTS: For both cohorts, baseline MRP8/14 and NE levels for patients who did or did not respond to treatment were not different. Also, MRP8/14 and NE levels were not different in patients who did or did not flare. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of MRP8/14 and NE demonstrated areas under the curve <0.7 in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: In our cohorts, MRP8/14 and NE could not predict treatment response. Also, when patients had inactive disease, neither marker could predict flares.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2392-2401
Number of pages10
JournalRheumatology (Oxford, England)
Volume59
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2020

Keywords

  • MRP8/14
  • S100A8/A9
  • biomarkers
  • calprotectin
  • disease activity
  • flare
  • juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • neutrophil elastase
  • prediction
  • treatment response

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MRP8/14 and neutrophil elastase for predicting treatment response and occurrence of flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this