Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mortality Prediction in Hip Fracture Patients: Physician Assessment Versus Prognostic Models

  • Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Department of Paediatrics, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, The Netherlands
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • Electron Microscopy Center Amsterdam
  • Tergooi Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives:To evaluate 2 prognostic models for mortality after a fracture of the hip, the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score and Hip Fracture Estimator of Mortality Amsterdam and to compare their predictive performance to physician assessment of mortality risk in hip fracture patients.Design:Prospective cohort study.Setting:Two level-2 trauma centers located in the Netherlands.Patients:Two hundred forty-four patients admitted to the Emergency Departments of both hospitals with a fractured hip.Intervention:Data used in both prediction models were collected at the time of admission for each individual patient, as well as predictions of mortality by treating physicians.Main Outcome Measures:Predictive performances were evaluated for 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC); calibration with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and calibration plots; clinical usefulness in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.Results:Mortality was 7.4% after 30 days, 22.1% after 1 year, and 59.4% after 5 years. There were no statistically significant differences in discrimination between the prediction methods (AUC 0.73-0.80). The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score demonstrated underfitting for 30-day mortality and failed to identify the majority of high-risk patients (sensitivity 33%). The Hip fracture Estimator of Mortality Amsterdam showed systematic overestimation and overfitting. Physicians were able to identify most high-risk patients for 30-day mortality (sensitivity 78%) but with some overestimation. Both risk models demonstrated a lack of fit when used for 1-year and 5-year mortality predictions.Conclusions:In this study, prognostic models and physicians demonstrated similar discriminating abilities when predicting mortality in hip fracture patients. Although physicians overestimated mortality, they were better at identifying high-risk patients and at predicting long-term mortality.Level of Evidence:Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-592
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of orthopaedic trauma
Volume36
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • hip fracture
  • mortality
  • physician judgment
  • prognostic model
  • risk prediction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mortality Prediction in Hip Fracture Patients: Physician Assessment Versus Prognostic Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this