Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Molecular genetic tests as a guide to surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis

  • H. F. A. Vasen*
  • , R. B. van der Luijt
  • , J. F. M. Slors
  • , E. Buskens
  • , P. de Ruiter
  • , C. G. M. Baeten
  • , W. R. Schouten
  • , H. J. M. Oostvogel
  • , J. H. C. Kuijpers
  • , C. M. J. Tops
  • , P. Meera Khan
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumours
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Leiden University
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • North West Hospital Group
  • Maastricht University
  • Erasmus MC
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Radboud University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background. In familial adenomatous polyposis the only curative treatment is colectomy, and the choice of operation lies between restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). The RPC procedure carries a higher morbidity but, unlike IRA, removes the risk of subsequent rectal cancer. Since the course of familial adenomatous polyposis is influenced by the site of mutation in the polyposis gene, DNA analysis might be helpful in treatment decisions. Methods. We evaluated the incidence of rectal cancer in polyposis patients who had undergone IRA, and examined whether the requirement for subsequent rectal excision because of cancer or uncontrollable polyps was related to the site of mutation. Findings. Between 1956 and mid-1995, 225 patients registered at the Netherlands Polyposis Registry had undergone IRA. In 87 of them, a pathogenetic metation was detected. 72 patients had a mutation located before codeon 1250 and 15 patients after this codon. The cumulative risk of rectal cancer 20 years after surgery was 12%, and at that time 42% had undergone rectal excision. The risk of secondary surgery was higher in patients with mutations in the region after codon 1250 than in patinets with mutations before this codon (relative risk 2.7, p < 0.05). Interpretation. On this evidence, IRA should be the primary treatment for polyposis in patients with mutations before codon 1250, and RPC in those with mutations after this codon.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-435
JournalLancet
Volume348
Issue number9025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Aug 1996
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular genetic tests as a guide to surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this