Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information

Han Boter; Johannes J. M. van Delden; Rob J. de Haan; Gabriël J. E. Rinkel

doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7409.284

Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information

Han Boter
, Johannes J. M. van Delden
, Rob J. de Haan
, Gabriël J. E. Rinkel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

How do you obtain a valid assessment of subjective outcomes in a trial in which the participants cannot be blinded to the intervention? Bias is inevitable from unblinded patients, but trials that have not told patients about treatment in all arms have been heavily criticised. Asking participants to consent to postponed information could be a solution

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	284-285
Journal	BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Volume	327
Issue number	7409
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7409.284
Publication status	Published - 2003

Access to Document

10.1136/bmj.327.7409.284

Cite this

@article{0c8e09d91fde4829b4f907241664ec89,

title = "Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information",

abstract = "How do you obtain a valid assessment of subjective outcomes in a trial in which the participants cannot be blinded to the intervention? Bias is inevitable from unblinded patients, but trials that have not told patients about treatment in all arms have been heavily criticised. Asking participants to consent to postponed information could be a solution",

author = "Han Boter and \{van Delden\}, \{Johannes J. M.\} and \{de Haan\}, \{Rob J.\} and Rinkel, \{Gabri{\"e}l J. E.\}",

year = "2003",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.327.7409.284",

language = "English",

volume = "327",

pages = "284--285",

journal = "BMJ (Clinical research ed.)",

issn = "0959-8138",

publisher = "British Medical Association",

number = "7409",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information

AU - Boter, Han

AU - van Delden, Johannes J. M.

AU - de Haan, Rob J.

AU - Rinkel, Gabriël J. E.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - How do you obtain a valid assessment of subjective outcomes in a trial in which the participants cannot be blinded to the intervention? Bias is inevitable from unblinded patients, but trials that have not told patients about treatment in all arms have been heavily criticised. Asking participants to consent to postponed information could be a solution

AB - How do you obtain a valid assessment of subjective outcomes in a trial in which the participants cannot be blinded to the intervention? Bias is inevitable from unblinded patients, but trials that have not told patients about treatment in all arms have been heavily criticised. Asking participants to consent to postponed information could be a solution

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.327.7409.284

DO - 10.1136/bmj.327.7409.284

M3 - Article

C2 - 12896945

SN - 0959-8138

VL - 327

SP - 284

EP - 285

JO - BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

JF - BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

IS - 7409

ER -

Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this