Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Minimally important differences for interpreting the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy

  • J. Z. Musoro*
  • , S. C. Sodergren
  • , C. Coens
  • , A. Pochesci
  • , M. Terada
  • , M. T. King
  • , M. A. G. Sprangers
  • , M. Groenvold
  • , K. Cocks
  • , G. Velikova
  • , H. H. Flechtner
  • , A. Bottomley
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center
  • University of Southampton
  • National Cancer Center Hospital
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Adelphi Group
  • University of Leeds
  • Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) assesses the health-related quality of life of patients in cancer trials. There are currently no minimally important difference (MID) guidelines for the EORTC QLQ-C30 for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to estimate MIDs for the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with advanced CRC treated with chemotherapy and enrolled in clinical trials. Method: The data were obtained from three published EORTC trials that treated CRC patients using chemotherapy. Potential anchors were selected from clinical variables based on their correlation with EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. Anchor-based MIDs for within-group change and between-group change were estimated via the mean change method and linear regression, respectively, and summarized using weighted correlation. Distribution-based MIDs were also examined. Results: Anchor-based MIDs were determined for deterioration in 8 of the 14 EORTC QLQ-C30 scales and in 9 scales for improvement, and varied by scale, direction of change and anchor. MIDs for improvement (deterioration) ranged from 6 to 18 (−11 to −5) points for within-group change and 5 to 15 (−10 to −4) for between-group change. Summarized MIDs (in absolute values) per scale mostly ranged from 5 to 10 points. Conclusions: These findings have clinical relevance for the interpretation of treatment efficacy and the design of clinical trials by informing sample size requirements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2278-2287
Number of pages10
JournalColorectal disease
Volume22
Issue number12
Early online date2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Advanced colorectal cancer
  • EORTC QLQ-C30
  • clinical anchors
  • health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
  • minimally important difference (MID)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally important differences for interpreting the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this