Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Minder controles na kanker is vaak net zo effectief

Translated title of the contribution: Less intensive follow-up after cancer is often equally effective
  • Radboudumc
  • Erasmus MC
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Follow-up after cancer consists of regular check-ups, aimed at the early detection of recurrences, and aftercare. For most cancers, intensive follow-up strategies are recommended. However, for several cancer types, including breast and colorectal cancer, reducing the follow-up frequency has had no detrimental effects on outcomes such as survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05; 95%-BI: 0.96-1.14) and patient satisfaction. In cancers with a favorable prognosis, less intensive follow-up is likely to be equally effective, and can be personalized to individual needs. To do so, current follow-up guidelines must be critically reevaluated, and the benefits of performing regular check-ups should be investigated.

Translated title of the contributionLess intensive follow-up after cancer is often equally effective
Original languageDutch
JournalNederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde
Volume168
Publication statusPublished - 23 Sept 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Aftercare/methods
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
  • Neoplasms/therapy
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Less intensive follow-up after cancer is often equally effective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this