Abstract
Follow-up after cancer consists of regular check-ups, aimed at the early detection of recurrences, and aftercare. For most cancers, intensive follow-up strategies are recommended. However, for several cancer types, including breast and colorectal cancer, reducing the follow-up frequency has had no detrimental effects on outcomes such as survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.05; 95%-BI: 0.96-1.14) and patient satisfaction. In cancers with a favorable prognosis, less intensive follow-up is likely to be equally effective, and can be personalized to individual needs. To do so, current follow-up guidelines must be critically reevaluated, and the benefits of performing regular check-ups should be investigated.
| Translated title of the contribution | Less intensive follow-up after cancer is often equally effective |
|---|---|
| Original language | Dutch |
| Journal | Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde |
| Volume | 168 |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Sept 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Humans
- Aftercare/methods
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Neoplasms/therapy
- Patient Satisfaction
- Prognosis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Less intensive follow-up after cancer is often equally effective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver