TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries
T2 - a psychometric analysis
AU - Koniewski, Maciej
AU - Barańska, Ilona
AU - Kijowska, Violetta
AU - van der Steen, Jenny T.
AU - Wichmann, Anne B.
AU - Payne, Sheila
AU - Gambassi, Giovanni
AU - van den Noortgate, Nele
AU - Finne-Soveri, Harriet
AU - PACE project
AU - Smets, Tinne
AU - van den Block, Lieve
AU - Szczerbińska, Katarzyna
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007e2013) under grant agreement 603111 (PACE project Palliative Care for Older People). The project was co-funded by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education in 2014–2019 based on the decision no. 3202/7PR/2014/2 dated November 25, 2014. The benefactors had no role in study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, nor in writing and decision to submit this article for publication.
Funding Information:
The authors thank all long-term care settings and their staff for participating in this project. The authors thank also other PACE collaborators not included in the author list: Eddy Adang, Paula Andreasen, Danni Collingridge Moore, Luc Deliens, Yvonne Engels, Katherine Froggatt, Hein van Hout, Maud ten Koppel, Marika Kylänen, Federica Mammarella, Martina Mercuri, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Mariska Oosterveld-Vlug, Lara Pivodic, Paola Rossi, Eleanor Sowerby, Agata Stodolska, Myrra Vernooij-Dassen, and the European Association for Palliative Care Onlus, European Forum for Primary Care, Age Platform Europe and Alzheimer Europe.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - The Family Perceptions of Physician-Family Caregiver Communication scale (FPPFC) was developed to assess quality of physician-family end-of-life communication in nursing homes. However, its validity has been tested only in the USA and the Netherlands. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the FPPFC construct validity and its reliability, as well as the psychometric characteristics of the items comprising the scale. Data were collected in cross-sectional study in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland. The factorial structure was tested in confirmatory factor analysis. Item parameters were obtained using an item response theory model. Participants were 737 relatives of nursing home residents who died up to 3 months prior to the study. In general, the FPPFC scale proved to be a unidimensional and reliable measure of the perceived quality of physician-family communication in nursing home settings in all five countries. Nevertheless, we found unsatisfactory fit to the data with a confirmatory model. An item that referred to advance care planning performed less well in Poland and Italy than in the Northern European countries. In the item analysis, we found that with no loss of reliability and with increased coherency of the item content across countries, the full 7-item version can be shortened to a 4-item version, which may be more appropriate for international studies. Therefore, we recommend use of the brief 4-item FPPFC version by nursing home managers and professionals as an evaluation tool, and by researchers for their studies as these four items confer the same meaning across countries.
AB - The Family Perceptions of Physician-Family Caregiver Communication scale (FPPFC) was developed to assess quality of physician-family end-of-life communication in nursing homes. However, its validity has been tested only in the USA and the Netherlands. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the FPPFC construct validity and its reliability, as well as the psychometric characteristics of the items comprising the scale. Data were collected in cross-sectional study in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland. The factorial structure was tested in confirmatory factor analysis. Item parameters were obtained using an item response theory model. Participants were 737 relatives of nursing home residents who died up to 3 months prior to the study. In general, the FPPFC scale proved to be a unidimensional and reliable measure of the perceived quality of physician-family communication in nursing home settings in all five countries. Nevertheless, we found unsatisfactory fit to the data with a confirmatory model. An item that referred to advance care planning performed less well in Poland and Italy than in the Northern European countries. In the item analysis, we found that with no loss of reliability and with increased coherency of the item content across countries, the full 7-item version can be shortened to a 4-item version, which may be more appropriate for international studies. Therefore, we recommend use of the brief 4-item FPPFC version by nursing home managers and professionals as an evaluation tool, and by researchers for their studies as these four items confer the same meaning across countries.
KW - Cross-sectional Study
KW - Family caregivers
KW - Nursing home
KW - Physician–patient relation
KW - Terminal care
KW - Validation study
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85141863302
U2 - 10.1007/s10433-022-00742-x
DO - 10.1007/s10433-022-00742-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 36506660
SN - 1613-9372
VL - 19
SP - 1561
EP - 1570
JO - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING
JF - EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING
IS - 4
ER -