Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of first responder programmes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe

  • University of Copenhagen
  • Danish PCD Centre, Pediatric Pulmonary Service, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark , Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Department of Sciences, Amsterdam University College, VU Amsterdam/University of Amsterdam, 1012 WX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: First responder (FR) programmes dispatch professional FRs (police and/or firefighters) or citizen responders to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use automated external defibrillators (AED) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We aimed to describe management of FR-programmes across Europe in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: In June 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey sent to OHCA registry representatives in 18 European countries with active FR-programmes. The survey was administered by e-mail and included questions regarding management of both citizen responder and FR-programmes. A follow-up question was conducted in October 2020 assessing management during a potential “second wave” of COVID-19. Results: All representatives responded (response rate = 100%). Fourteen regions dispatched citizen responders and 17 regions dispatched professional FRs (9 regions dispatched both). Responses were post-hoc divided into three categories: FR activation continued unchanged, FR activation continued with restrictions, or FR activation temporarily paused. For citizen responders, regions either temporarily paused activation (n = 7, 50.0%) or continued activation with restrictions (n = 7, 50.0%). The most common restriction was to omit rescue breaths and perform compression-only CPR. For professional FRs, nine regions continued activation with restrictions (52.9%) and five regions (29.4%) continued activation unchanged, but with personal protective equipment available for the professional FRs. In three regions (17.6%), activation of professional FRs temporarily paused. Conclusion: Most regions changed management of FR-programmes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies are needed to investigate the consequences of pausing or restricting FR-programmes for bystander CPR and AED use, and how this may impact patient outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100075
Pages (from-to)100075
JournalResuscitation plus
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • AED
  • Citizen responder
  • Corona
  • CPR
  • OHCA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of first responder programmes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this