Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Making shared care work: A national qualitative case study on collaborative practice in pediatric oncology

  • Natasja Dors*
  • , Martine van Grotel
  • , Eline Zijtregtop
  • , Nathalie van der Salm
  • , Laura Keukens
  • , Selma Lavrijssen
  • , Charlotte Drykoningen
  • , Anne Jonge Poerink
  • , Rod Thompson
  • , Jenneke Homan
  • , Menco Weismuller
  • , Wendy Nix
  • , Hester Blufpand
  • , Annemieke van der Wey
  • , Daniëlle Martens
  • , Marion Hekkelaan
  • , Lotte Helder
  • , Wouter Kollen
  • , Max van Noesel
  • , Marije P. Hennus
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • University of Groningen
  • Frisius Medical Center
  • Catharina Hospital
  • Gelderland Valley Hospital
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • VieCuri Medisch Centrum
  • Deventer Ziekenhuis
  • Dijklander Hospital
  • Admiraal de Ruijter Hospital
  • Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
  • Isala
  • Reinier de Graaf Groep
  • Utrecht University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: In 2018, the Netherlands centralized all pediatric oncology care at the Prinses Máxima Center (Máxima), supported by a national network of 14 Shared Care centers. These centers deliver non-intensive treatment and supportive care closer to home, enabling a hybrid model of centralized expertise and regional accessibility. While structurally in place, little is known about how regional pediatricians experience this collaboration or which factors they consider essential to its success. Methods: This national qualitative multiple case study explored interprofessional collaboration between the Máxima and its Shared Care partners, from the perspective of pediatricians in all 14 regional centers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed inductively using ATLAS.ti. Analysis was informed by Kaats & Opheij's collaboration framework, encompassing shared ambition, mutual interests, interpersonal relationships, structured collaboration, and meaningful processes. Peer debriefing was used to enhance trustworthiness and ensure clinical relevance. Results: Participants emphasized that close collaboration is indispensable for delivering safe, high-quality pediatric oncology care. Enabling factors included mutual trust, personal familiarity, timely and clear communication, and professional recognition. Challenges were identified in areas such as inconsistent policy implementation, opaque decision-making, and insufficient acknowledgment of local expertise. Many called for differentiated, context-sensitive care agreements rather than one-size-fits-all approaches. Conclusion: Effective shared care requires more than structural alignment: it demands investment in professional relationships, shared goals, and adaptive processes. These findings offer actionable insights to improve collaboration within the Dutch model and provide transferable lessons for other countries navigating centralized care in highcomplex, low-volume pediatric specialties.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100485
Journal2730;2919;2735
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Centralized care
  • Healthcare partnerships
  • Network
  • Pediatric oncology
  • Physician perspective
  • Qualitative study
  • Regional collaboration
  • Shared Care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making shared care work: A national qualitative case study on collaborative practice in pediatric oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this