Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Loss of p53 suppresses replication-stress-induced DNA breakage in G1/S checkpoint deficient cells

  • Bente Benedict
  • , Tanja van Harn
  • , Marleen Dekker
  • , Simone Hermsen
  • , Asli Kucukosmanoglu
  • , Wietske Pieters
  • , Elly Delzenne-Goette
  • , Josephine C. Dorsman
  • , Eva Petermann
  • , Floris Foijer
  • , Hein te Riele
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • University of Birmingham
  • UMCG/RU Groningen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In cancer cells, loss of G1/S control is often accompanied by p53 pathway inactivation, the latter usually rationalized as a necessity for suppressing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, we found an unanticipated effect of p53 loss in mouse and human G1-checkpoint-deficient cells: reduction of DNA damage. We show that abrogation of the G1/S-checkpoint allowed cells to enter S-phase under growth-restricting conditions at the expense of severe replication stress manifesting as decelerated DNA replication, reduced origin firing and accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks. In this system, loss of p53 allowed mitogen-independent proliferation, not by suppressing apoptosis, but rather by restoring origin firing and reducing DNA breakage. Loss of G1/S control also caused DNA damage and activation of p53 in an in vivo retinoblastoma model. Moreover, in a teratoma model, loss of p53 reduced DNA breakage. Thus, loss of p53 may promote growth of incipient cancer cells by reducing replication-stress-induced DNA damage.
Original languageEnglish
JournaleLife
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Loss of p53 suppresses replication-stress-induced DNA breakage in G1/S checkpoint deficient cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this