Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obstetric interventions can have unexpected long-term effects on child development. However, evaluation of these outcomes is not standard in current research.
OBJECTIVES: To give an overview of long-term follow-up studies after randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating interventions to prevent preterm birth in asymptomatic pregnancies.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Library were searched for relevant RCTs. WebofScience was crosschecked for citations of these RCTs for publications on long-term child outcomes.
SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs evaluating interventions to prevent preterm birth in asymptomatic pregnant women. A long-term follow-up study was defined as such when child outcomes were assessed after discharge from hospital after birth.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Proportion of RCTs with long-term child follow-up was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data on child's age at follow-up, outcome domains evaluated and measurement instruments were extracted.
MAIN RESULTS: We included 188 RCTs that evaluated interventions to prevent preterm birth. Only 15 of these RCTs assessed long-term child outcomes (8.0%; 95% CI 4.5 to 12.8) with 17 publications (two RCTs performed two follow-up studies). In 13 out of 17 (76.5%) follow-up publications, neurodevelopment was the primary outcome domain studied for which seven different standardized measurement tools were used. In total, 14 different standardized measurement tools were used to assess long-term outcomes. Overall conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the intervention changed in six studies (6/14 studies; 42.9%) based on long-term follow-up findings compared to the original RCT.
CONCLUSION: Only a minority of the RCTs evaluating prevention of preterm birth interventions performed a long-term follow-up study to assess long-term outcomes on child development. However, the overall conclusions changed in one third of cases. Performance of follow-up studies should be standard in this population in order to counsel parents on potential childhood effects.
FUNDING: Amsterdam Reproduction and Development.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 35-41 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology |
| Volume | 303 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2024 |
Keywords
- Humans
- Premature Birth/prevention & control
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Pregnancy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Child
- Infant, Newborn
- Child Development
- Child, Preschool
- Long-term child follow-up
- Neurodevelopment
- Preterm birth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term child follow-up after randomised controlled trials evaluating prevention of preterm birth interventions: a systematic review: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver