TY - JOUR
T1 - La serendipia en torno la fracción de eyección
T2 - una revisión de la historia, la casualidad y la cuasi-funcionalidad de una métrica aplaudida
AU - KERKHOF, P. ET. ER L. M.
AU - Díaz-Navarro, Rienzi
AU - HEYNDRICKX, G. UY R.
AU - Handly, Neal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Sociedad Medica de Santiago. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - Ejection fraction (EF) is defined by the ratio of end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV). The resulting fraction is a dimensionless number whose interpretation is ambiguous and most likely misleading. Despite this limitation, EF is widely accepted as a clinical marker of cardiac function. In this article we analyze the role of ESV, a fundamental variable of ventricular mechanics, compared with the popular EF. Common physiology-based mathematics can explain a simple association between EF and ESV. This concept is illustrated by a detailed analysis of the information obtained from angiocardiography, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance studies. EF versus ESV produces a non-linear curve. For a small ESV, the EF approaches 100%, while for a large ESV, the EF gradually decreases toward zero. This elemental relationship is commonly observed in innervated natural hearts. Thus, the popularity of EF mostly derives from a fortuitous connection with the pivotal variable ESV. Alongside this finding, we unfold historical events that facilitated the emergence of EF as a result of serendipity. Our physiology-based approach denounces the circumstantial theories invoked to justify the importance of EF as an index of cardiac function, which are critically discussed. EF appears to be nothing more than a blessing in disguise. For this reason, we propose the ESV as a more logical metric for the analysis of ventricular function.
AB - Ejection fraction (EF) is defined by the ratio of end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV). The resulting fraction is a dimensionless number whose interpretation is ambiguous and most likely misleading. Despite this limitation, EF is widely accepted as a clinical marker of cardiac function. In this article we analyze the role of ESV, a fundamental variable of ventricular mechanics, compared with the popular EF. Common physiology-based mathematics can explain a simple association between EF and ESV. This concept is illustrated by a detailed analysis of the information obtained from angiocardiography, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance studies. EF versus ESV produces a non-linear curve. For a small ESV, the EF approaches 100%, while for a large ESV, the EF gradually decreases toward zero. This elemental relationship is commonly observed in innervated natural hearts. Thus, the popularity of EF mostly derives from a fortuitous connection with the pivotal variable ESV. Alongside this finding, we unfold historical events that facilitated the emergence of EF as a result of serendipity. Our physiology-based approach denounces the circumstantial theories invoked to justify the importance of EF as an index of cardiac function, which are critically discussed. EF appears to be nothing more than a blessing in disguise. For this reason, we propose the ESV as a more logical metric for the analysis of ventricular function.
KW - Heart Failure
KW - Heart Ventricles
KW - Physiology
KW - Ventricular Dysfunction
KW - Ventricular Function
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135587261&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156650
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135587261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4067/S0034-98872022000200232
DO - 10.4067/S0034-98872022000200232
M3 - Article
C2 - 36156650
SN - 0034-9887
VL - 150
SP - 232
EP - 240
JO - Revista Medica de Chile
JF - Revista Medica de Chile
IS - 2
ER -