Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kinematics before and after reconstruction of the anterior syndesmosis of the ankle: A prospective radiostereometric and clinical study in 5 patients

  • Annechien Beumer
  • , Edward R. Valstar
  • , Eric H. Garling
  • , Ruud Niesing
  • , Rien P. Heijboer
  • , Jonas Ranstam
  • , Bart A. Swierstra*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Lund University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: We have previously shown that patients with instability of the anterior syndesmosis benefit from an anatomical reconstruction. It is not known whether this is because of restored kinematics. Methods: In a prospective study of 5 patients, we assessed clinical findings and tibiofibular kinematics, evaluated by radiostereometry, before and after reconstruction of a chronic syndesmotic injury. Results: We found no statistically significant differences in tibiofibular kinematics before and after reconstruction. The kinematics of the fibula relative to the tibia during external rotation stress differed from that known in asymptomatic volunteers, but the differences were not typical enough to differentiate between patients and healthy subjects. Clinical examination and ankle scores, however, showed that all patients benefited from reconstruction of the anterior syndesmosis. Interpretation: Radiostereometry is not an adequate technique to diagnose chronic syndesmotic instability or to demonstrate restoration of the kinematics of the ankle as a cause of the beneficial effect of anatomical reconstruction of the syndesmosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)713-720
Number of pages8
JournalActa orthopaedica
Volume76
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kinematics before and after reconstruction of the anterior syndesmosis of the ankle: A prospective radiostereometric and clinical study in 5 patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this