Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma? The Rotterdam Study

  • Simone de Voogd
  • , M. Kamran Ikram
  • , Roger C. W. Wolfs
  • , Nomdo M. Jansonius
  • , Jacqueline C. M. Witteman
  • , Albert Hofman
  • , Paulus T. V. M. de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To investigate whether diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Prospective population-based cohort study. Participants ages > or =55 years from the Rotterdam Study, The Netherlands. Participants at risk for incident OAG (iOAG) underwent at baseline (1990-1993) and follow-up (1997-1999) the same ophthalmic examination including intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, visual field testing, and simultaneous stereo optic disc photography. At baseline, diabetes mellitus was defined as the use of antidiabetic medication and/or a random or postload glucose value > or =11.1 mmol/l. The diagnosis of OAG was made with an algorithm based on optic disc measures and visual fields, independent of the IOP. Incident OAG. In total, 3837 participants without OAG at baseline were reexamined. After a mean follow-up time of 6.5 years, iOAG developed in 87 persons. The relative risk of iOAG associated with baseline diabetes was 0.82 (0.33-2.05). After adjustment for age, gender, follow-up time, IOP, IOP-lowering treatment, body mass index, and systemic hypertension, the relative risk of iOAG was 0.65 (0.25-1.64). In this prospective population-based study, diabetes mellitus was not a risk factor for OAG
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1827-1831
JournalOphthalmology
Volume113
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma? The Rotterdam Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this