Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Survey Assessing Gender Disparities in Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy

  • Katarzyna M. Pawlak
  • , Kareem Khalaf
  • , Erin Brennand
  • , Andrei Voiosu
  • , Theodor Voiosu
  • , Giulio Antonelli
  • , Sharan B. Malipatil
  • , Caleb Na
  • , Ahmed H. Mokhtar
  • , Balqis Alabdulkarim
  • , Maryam Mahjoob
  • , Arjun Kundra
  • , Jeanin van Hooft
  • , Uzma Siddiqui
  • , Roberta Maselli
  • , Jeffrey D. Mosko
  • , Jennifer Telford
  • , Nauzer Forbes
  • , Natalia Causada Calo*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Calgary
  • Colentina Hospital
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Ospedale dei Castelli
  • University of Virginia
  • Leiden University
  • The University of Chicago
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • University of British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Underrepresentation of women in advanced therapeutic endoscopy is a multifactorial issue. We aim to evaluate the concerns about fluoroscopy use across genders and assess its impact on the representation of women in advanced therapeutic endoscopy. METHODS: An international survey was distributed in August of 2023 to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)–performing physicians. The primary outcome was the frequency of concerns related to fluoroscopy exposure. Secondary outcomes included the reasons or implication of these concerns. Subgroup analyses were performed across gender. RESULTS: ERCP-performing physicians revealed a gender disparity in therapeutic endoscopy, with 72.8% male respondents and 27.2% female respondents. Most participants were staff (67.6%), predominantly men (70.6%). The average age was 38.2 years, with a median institutional ERCP volume of 550 cases. Awareness of fluoroscopy safety standards was 56.1%, but only 51.6% received formal training. Concerns about radiation included cancer risk (73.4%) and fertility (43.9%). Usage of protective equipment was inadequate: thyroid dosimeters (21.9% always used), pelvic dosimeters (13.1%), and leaded goggles (8.4%). Female respondents specifically noted delayed family planning (27.6%) and fear of working while pregnant (40.4%), whereas male respondents focused on general health risks. Additionally, 68.4% of institutions recorded fluoroscopy time, but only 56.1% reported dosimeter use. CONCLUSION: Gender disparities in fluoroscopy exposure concerns warrant the need for improved training and safety standards to foster equity in therapeutic endoscopy. Addressing these issues through targeted education and policy changes will not only enhance awareness of radiation risks but also promote a more inclusive environment for both male and female practitioners.
Original languageEnglish
Article number250917
JournalTechniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education
  3. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality
  4. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Gastrointestinal endoscopy
  • Radiation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Survey Assessing Gender Disparities in Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this