TY - JOUR
T1 - International multi-stakeholder consensus statement on patient, carer and public involvement to enhance clinical trial integrity
AU - Khan, Khalid Saeed
AU - Fawzy, Mohamed
AU - Juhász, Balázs
AU - Chien, Patrick
AU - Martín-Díaz, Manuel
AU - Zamora, Javier
AU - Ruano Raviña, Alberto
AU - Núñez-Núñez, María
AU - Del Carmen Amezcua Prieto, Maria
AU - Martínez Vázquez, Sergio
AU - González Casas, León
AU - Pacey, Allan
AU - Martinez de Tejada, Begoña
AU - Harasani, Klejda
AU - Khalaf, Yacoub
AU - Serour, Gamal
AU - Aboulghar, Mohamed
AU - Sallam, Hassan
AU - Martín Sánchez, Vicente
AU - Ocón Hernández, Olga
AU - Grandi, Giovanni
AU - Wattar, Bassel
AU - Parry-Smith, William
AU - Ball, Elizabeth
AU - van 't Hooft, Janneke
AU - Mahran, Ali
AU - Mignini, Luciano
AU - Bedaiwy, Mohamed
AU - Yehia Soliman, Mohamed
AU - El-Shalakany, Amr
AU - Joshi, Miland
AU - Moss, Ngawai
AU - Andrews, Jeffrey A
AU - Jim Zhang, Jun
AU - Geary, Michael
AU - Odibo, Anthony
AU - Wasim, Tayyiba
AU - Cano Ibáñez, Naomi
AU - Elsuity, Mohamad A
AU - Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2026/3/25
Y1 - 2026/3/25
N2 - BACKGROUND: The recent update of the Declaration of Helsinki has emphasized community engagement and research integrity. Patient, carer and public involvement (PCPI) throughout the research lifecycle of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) can enhance their integrity. However, no specific PCPI guidance exists for trialists. The Cairo Consensus Group on Research Integrity, consisting of 40 stakeholders from 14 countries, developed a statement to address this gap.METHODS: The project was prospectively registered at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fqepb). Based on the findings of a literature review and a stakeholder consultation, an initial long list of recommendations was created. It was submitted to a two-round modified Delphi survey before being finalized in a hybrid online-face-to-face meeting.RESULTS: The modified Delphi survey response rate was 63% (29/46) for the first round, and 65% (30/46) for the second round. The initial long list consisted of 46 statements, and nine additional statements were provided during the consensus process. The final set consolidated 39 statements, grouped into seven categories: General; Design, Approval and Funding; Conduct and Monitoring; Reporting of protocols and findings; Dissemination and Implementation; and Future Research and Development.CONCLUSION: This international consensus statement is expected to help organizations implement PCPI to enhance RCT integrity.
AB - BACKGROUND: The recent update of the Declaration of Helsinki has emphasized community engagement and research integrity. Patient, carer and public involvement (PCPI) throughout the research lifecycle of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) can enhance their integrity. However, no specific PCPI guidance exists for trialists. The Cairo Consensus Group on Research Integrity, consisting of 40 stakeholders from 14 countries, developed a statement to address this gap.METHODS: The project was prospectively registered at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fqepb). Based on the findings of a literature review and a stakeholder consultation, an initial long list of recommendations was created. It was submitted to a two-round modified Delphi survey before being finalized in a hybrid online-face-to-face meeting.RESULTS: The modified Delphi survey response rate was 63% (29/46) for the first round, and 65% (30/46) for the second round. The initial long list consisted of 46 statements, and nine additional statements were provided during the consensus process. The final set consolidated 39 statements, grouped into seven categories: General; Design, Approval and Funding; Conduct and Monitoring; Reporting of protocols and findings; Dissemination and Implementation; and Future Research and Development.CONCLUSION: This international consensus statement is expected to help organizations implement PCPI to enhance RCT integrity.
KW - Randomized clinical trial
KW - consensus
KW - patient and public involvement
KW - research integrity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105033619385
U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2026.2647346
DO - 10.1080/08989621.2026.2647346
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41878840
SN - 0898-9621
SP - 2647346
JO - Accountability in Research
JF - Accountability in Research
M1 - 2647346
ER -