Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interassay Comparison With Digital Image Analysis of 4 Routine Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Immunohistochemistry Assays in Primary Breast Cancer and Its Metastasis

  • Maaike Anna Hempenius*
  • , Mieke C. Zwager
  • , Jeppe Thagaard
  • , Lorian Slagter-Menkema
  • , Henk J. Buikema
  • , Ellis Barbé
  • , Michael A. den Bakker
  • , Marjolein G. J. Heerema
  • , Elisabeth G. E. de Vries
  • , Carolina P. Schröder
  • , Nils A. ’t Hart
  • , Bert van der Vegt
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Groningen
  • Visiopharm
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Maasstad Hospital
  • Pathologie Friesland
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Isala Clinics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Trastuzumab-deruxtecan, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), improves overall survival in patients with breast cancer showing low or ultralow HER2 expression. Differences in HER2 test results have been reported between various HER2 assays and between primary tumors and metastases, but an objective comparison with incorporation of the new HER2-ultralow cutoff values is needed. This study aimed to assess the performance of 4 routine clinical-grade HER2 assays across and between primary tumors and their metastases using digital image analysis. Primary tumors and metastases from 193 patients with breast cancer who participated in the IMaging PAtients for Cancer drug selecTion—Metastatic Breast Cancer trial were incorporated into 6 tissue microarrays. Samples were stained by 4 laboratories using their routine HER2 immunohistochemistry protocols: 4B5 ultraView, 4B5 OptiView, SP3, and HercepTest (DG44). HER2 scores were determined using digital image analysis. The 4 HER2 assays showed significant differences in HER2 status in both primary tumors and metastases. Eighty-five matched primary tumors and metastases were analyzed to investigate concordance in HER2 status. Although no significant differences were found in HER2 scores between primary tumors and metastases for SP3 and both 4B5 assays, DG44 showed significantly higher HER2 scores in the metastasis (P = .004). Concordance between primary tumors and metastases was highest for 4B5 ultraView (69.4%), followed by SP3 (61.2%) and 4B5 OptiView (51.8%). DG44 showed the most variability, with only 36.5% of matched samples receiving the same HER2 category. DG44 identified a significantly higher proportion of HER2-(ultra)low cases and showed the most variability in HER2 status between matched primary tumors and metastases compared with 4B5 and SP3. The choice of HER2 assay can lead to discrepancies in HER2 status assessment, which could directly influence patient eligibility for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104261
JournalLaboratory Investigation
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • HER2
  • HER2 ultralow
  • assay comparison
  • breast cancer
  • immunohistochemistry
  • trastuzumab-deruxtecan

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interassay Comparison With Digital Image Analysis of 4 Routine Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Immunohistochemistry Assays in Primary Breast Cancer and Its Metastasis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this