Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integrated versus separate reading of F-18 FDG-PET/CT and MRI for abdominal malignancies – effect on staging outcomes and diagnostic confidence

  • Lisa A. Min
  • , Wouter V. Vogel
  • , Max J. Lahaye
  • , Monique Maas
  • , Maarten L. Donswijk
  • , Erik Vegt
  • , Miranda Kusters
  • , Henry J. Zijlmans
  • , Katarzyna Jóźwiak
  • , Sander Roberti
  • , Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
  • , Doenja M. J. Lambregts*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Institute for Public Health Genomics (IPHG), Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands;
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Maastricht University
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Abdominal cancer patients increasingly undergo multimodality imaging. This study evaluates effects of integrated reading of PET/CT and abdominal MRI on staging outcomes and diagnostic confidence compared to “routine” separate reading. Methods: In total, N = 201 patients who underwent abdominal MRI and whole-body F-18 FDG-PET/CT within 14 days were retrospectively analyzed. Original MRI and PET/CT reports were retrieved and reported findings translated into a 5-point confidence score (1 = definitely benign to 5 = definitely malignant) for 7 standardized regions (primary tumor/regional lymph nodes/distant lymph nodes/liver/lung/bone/peritoneum) per patient. Two-reader teams (radiologist + nuclear medicine physician) then performed integrated reading of the images using the same scoring system. Results: Integrated reading led to discrepant findings in 59 of 201 (29%) of patients, with potential clinical impact in 25 of 201 (12%). Equivocal scores decreased from 5.7% (PET/CT) and 5.4% (MRI) to 3.2% (p = 0.05 and p = 0.14). Compared to the original PET/CT reports, integrated reading led to increased diagnostic confidence in 8.9% versus decreased confidence in 6.6% (p = 0.26). Compared with the original MRI reports, an increase in confidence occurred in 9.6% versus a decrease in 6.9% (p = 0.18). The effect on diagnostic confidence was most pronounced in lymph nodes (p = 0.08 vs. MRI), cervical cancer (p = 0.03 vs. MRI), and recurrent disease staging (p = 0.06 vs. PET/CT). Conclusions: Integrated PET/CT+MRI reading alters staging outcomes in a substantial proportion of cases with potential clinical impact in ± 1 out of 9 patients. It can also have a small positive effect on diagnostic confidence, particularly in lymph nodes and cervical cancer, and in post-treatment settings. These findings support further collaboration between radiology and nuclear medicine disciplines. Key Points: • Increasing numbers of patients undergo multimodality imaging consisting of both MRI and PET/CT for staging of abdominal malignancies. • Integrated reading of FDG-PET/CT and abdominal MR images by a team, consisting of a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician, can alter staging outcomes compared to separate reporting of the exams in a substantial proportion of cases and with potential clinical impact in ± 1 out of 9 patients. • Integrated PET/CT+MRI reading can have a small positive effect on diagnostic confidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6900-6910
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean radiology
Volume29
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Multimodal imaging
  • Neoplasms
  • Positron emission tomography computed tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated versus separate reading of F-18 FDG-PET/CT and MRI for abdominal malignancies – effect on staging outcomes and diagnostic confidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this